Preview

Medical Visualization

Advanced search

Assessment of Lymph Node Status in Gastric Cancer. Part 2: Diagnostic Efficacy of Computed Tomography for the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Gastric Cancer Patients

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of computed tomography (CT) in detecting of regional lymph nodes metastases in gastric cancer patients. Materials and methods. Work is based on the comparison of clinical and pathologic features in 69 gastric cancer patients (42 (61%) men, 27 (39%) women, ranging in age from 24 to 79 years). All of the patients underwent preoperative multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Parameters of lymph nodes evaluated were presence or absence of nodes in the regional areas, their number, size and shape. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS statistical software version 13.0. The qualitative data were evaluated with Pearson х2 test; the diagnostic values of lymph node shape for delectability of lymph node metastasis were evaluated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results. The frequency of lymph node metastasis was associated significantly with their number (three or more) (х2 = 8.395; p = 0.004), size (up to 10 mm or more than 10 mm) (х2 = 8.448; Р=0,002), and node shape (the ratio of long and short diameters <1.5 site) (х2 = 9.996; Р = 0.001). Sensitivity of computed tomography in the assessment of metastatic lymph nodes were 86.4%, specificity - 89.4%, accuracy - 88.4%, positive predictive value - 79.2%, and its negative predictive value - 93.3%. Conclusion. The use of CT criteria and regional lymph node assessment scheme improves the preoperative evaluation and allows the radiologist to examine successively every possible zone of regional lymph nodes localization. Combination of factors such as: the location of lymph nodes, three or more nodes, and enlargement 10 mm or more, their rounded shape was the optimal diagnostic criterion for lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.

About the Authors

Tatev Artakovna Agababian
Medical Radiological Research Center of the Russian Ministry of Health
Russian Federation


Natalya Konstantinovna Silanteva
Medical Radiological Research Center of the Russian Ministry of Health
Russian Federation


References

1. Dehn T.C., Rezneck R.H., Nockler I.B., White F.E. The preoperative assessment of advanced gastric cancer by computed tomography. Br. J. Surg. 1984; 71 (6): 413-417.

2. Balthazar E.J., Megibow A.J., Hulnick D., Naidich D.P. Carcinoma of the colon: detection and preoperative staging by CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1988; 150: 301-306.

3. Dorfman R.E., Alpern M.B., Gross B.H., Sandler M.A. Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. Radiology. 1991; 180 (2): 319-322.

4. Einstein D.M., Singer A.A., Chilcote W.A., Desai R. Abdominal lymph adenopathy: spectrum of CT findings. RadioGraphics. 1991; 11 (3): 457-472.

5. Grantfield C.A., Charnsangavej C., Dubrow R.A. et al. Regional lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the side of the colon and rectum: CT demonstration. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1992; 159 (4): 757-761.

6. Sussman S.K., Halvorsen R.A., Illescas F.F. et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma: CT versus surgical staging. Radiology. 1988; 167 (2): 335-340.

7. Араблинский В.М., Седых С.А., Мамонтов А.С. Роль компьютерной томографии в диагностике регионарных метастазов рака пищевода и проксимального отдела желудка. Сов. мед. 1991; 9: 26-29.

8. Davies J., Chalmers A.G., Sue-Ling H.M. et al. Spiral computed tomography and operative staging of gastric carcinoma: a comparison with histopathological staging. Gut. 1997; 41 (3): 314-319.

9. Paramo J.C., Gomez G. Dynamic CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with gastric cancer: correlation with surgical findings and pathology. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 1999; 6(4): 379-384.

10. Wei W.Z., Yu J.P., Li J. et al. Evaluation of contrastenhanced helical hydro-CT in staging gastric cancer. Wld J. Gastroenterol. 2005; 11 (29): 4592-4595.

11. Cidon E.U., Cuenca I.J. Gastric adenocarcinoma: is computed tomography useful in preoperative staging? Clin. Med.: Oncology. 2009; 3: 91-97.

12. Kim Y.N., Choi D., Kim S.H. et al. Gastric cancer staging at isotropic MDCT including coronal and sagittal MPR images: endoscopically diagnosed early vs advanced gastric cancer. Abdom. Imaging. 2009; 34 (1): 26-34.

13. Fukuya T., Hiroshi H., Hayashi T. et al. Lymph node metastases: efficacy of detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer. Radiology. 1995; 197 (3): 705-711.

14. Hundt W., Braunschweig R., Reiser M. Assessment of gastric cancer: value of breathhold technique and two-phase spiral CT. Eur. Radiol. 1999; 9 (1): 68-72.

15. D’Elia F., Zingareli A., Palli D., Grani M. Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging of gastric cancer: correlation with pathological findings - a prospective study of 107 cases. Eur. Radiol. 2000; 10 (12): 1877-1885.

16. Лойт А.А., Гуляев А.В., Михайлов Г.А. Рак желудка. Лимфогенное метастазирование. М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2006. 56 c.


Review

For citations:


Agababian T.A., Silanteva N.K. Assessment of Lymph Node Status in Gastric Cancer. Part 2: Diagnostic Efficacy of Computed Tomography for the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Gastric Cancer Patients. Medical Visualization. 2014;(2):61-67. (In Russ.)

Views: 2247


ISSN 1607-0763 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9516 (Online)