Radiography and MSCT in the Diagnostic of Acetabular Fractures
Abstract
Objective. To determine the value of the integrated use of conventional radiography and computed tomography (MSCT) in the diagnosis and assessment of treatment outcomes in patients with fractures of the acetabulum. Materials and methods. The results of examination and treatment of 75 patients with fractures of the acetabulum aged 27 to 49 years using the methods of X-ray and MSCT for the objectification of the results of surgical treatment. Results. The five main types of pelvic fractures involving the acetabulum according to the most frequently used at present anatomical fractures classification of Judet- Letournel are described in detail and demonstrated. Presents the possibility of X-ray and MSCT in patients with injuries of the pelvis before and after reconstructive surgery to restore the integrity of the assessment of the pelvis. Conclusion. MSCT and X-ray are very informative methods of diagnosis of acetabular injury and can accurately determine the type of fracture of the acetabulum, determining the choice of medical tactics, as well as allowing you to assess the results of the treatment.
About the Authors
Zhanna Vladimirovna Sheikh
City Clinical Hospital named after S.P. Botkin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey Vladimirovich Arablinskyi
City Clinical Hospital named after S.P. Botkin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Grigory Grogorevoch Karmazanovsky
A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey Victorovich Donchenko
City Clinical Hospital named after S.P. Botkin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitriy Vladimirovich Alekseev
City Clinical Hospital named after S.P. Botkin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey Vasilyevich Klimko
City Clinical Hospital named after S.P. Botkin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Goulet J.A., Bray T.J. Complex acetabular fractures. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1989; 240: 9-20.
2. Brandser E., Marsh J.L. Acetabular fractures: easier classification with a systematic approach. AJR. 1998; 171: 1217-1228.
3. Sathy A.K., Starr A.J., Smith W.R. et al. The effect of pelvic fracture on mortality after trauma: an analysis of 63,000 trauma patients. J. Bone J. Surg. Am. 2009; 91: 2803.
4. Trauma. Eds Feliciano D.V., Mattox K.L., Moore E.E. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008: 967-968.
5. Серебрякова С.В. Спиральная компьютерная томография в диагностике травмы таза: Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. СПб., 2004. 20 с.
6. Judet R., Judet J., Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction-preliminary report. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1964; 46:1615-1646.
7. Letournel E., Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum, 2nd ed. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1993; 733 p.
8. Hunter J.C., Brandser E.A., Tran K.A. Pelvic and acetabular trauma. Radiol. Clin N. Am. 1997; 35: 559-590.
9. Harris J.H. Jr., Coupe K.J., Lee J.S., Trotscher T. Acetabular fractures revisited. Part 2. A new CT-based classification. AJR. 2004; 182:1367-1375.
10. Шлыков И.Л. Система диагностики и комплексного лечения больных с переломами костей таза и вертлужной впадины: Автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. Саратов, 2010. 35 с.
11. Martinez C.R., Di Pasquale T.G., Helfet D.L. et al. Evaluation of acetabular fractures with two- and three-dimensional CT. RadioGraphics. 1992; 12:227-242.
12. Falchi M., Rollandi G.A. CT of pelvic fractures. Eur. Radiol. 2004; 50: 96-105.
Review
For citations:
Sheikh Zh.V., Arablinskyi A.V., Karmazanovsky G.G., Donchenko S.V., Alekseev D.V., Klimko S.V. Radiography and MSCT in the Diagnostic of Acetabular Fractures. Medical Visualization. 2016;(1):113-122. (In Russ.)
Views:
1208
Email this article 