Preview

Medical Visualization

Advanced search

Comparative Study of the Possibilities of Bone Scintigraphy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Whole Body in the Diagnosis of Bone Metastases

Abstract

Purpose. Compare the characteristics of MRI techniques and whole-body bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastases in primary malignant tumors of the most frequent sites. Materials and methods. 29 patients with malignant tumors of different localization and suspected secondary bone lesions were examined at “RNTSRR”. All patients underwent bone scan to gamma camera Nucline DHW using mono-and diphosphates of Tc-99m activity of 370-600 MBq, as well as MRI “whole body” for magnetic resonance imaging “Atlas” 1.5 T, and “Signa” 1.5 T The diagnosis of secondary bone lesions was further confirmed by the data MSCT or supervision for 6 months. Results. Metastatic bone lesions were present in 21 (72.4%) patients, benign nature were identified at 8 patients (27.6%) patients. According to the results of the use of MRI techniques “whole body” was placed 1 false-negative and false-positive diagnosis 2, the sensitivity of techniques was 95.2% (20/21), specificity of 75% (6.8). According to bone scan were mentioned 3 false-negative results, and 3 falsepositive, the sensitivity was 85.7% technique (18/21), specificity - 62.5% (8.5). The accuracy of the technique of the whole body MRI was 89.6% (26/29), bone scintigraphy - 79.3% (23/29). Conclusions. MRI “whole body” is a more objective procedure than bone scan, due to a more accurate visualization of anatomical zones. Using MRI “whole body” for suspected secondary bone disease can reduce the need for additional diagnostic studies. MRI “whole body” is no-radiation procedure, but it is technically difficult and may not be performed at all equipment, which leads to increased cost of study.

About the Authors

Nikolay Ivanovich Sergeev
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology
Russian Federation


Dmitry Kirillovich Fomin
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology
Russian Federation


Peter Mikhaylovich Kotlyarov
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology
Russian Federation


Nikolay Vasilyevich Nudnov
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology
Russian Federation


Vladimir Alekseevich Solodkiy
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology
Russian Federation


References

1. Niederhuber J.E., Armitage J.O., Doroshow J.H., Kastan M.B. Abeloff's Clinical Oncology:51. Fifth Edition. Elsevier, 2013. 739-763.

2. Pearce T, Philip S., Brown J. et al. Bone metastases from prostate, breast and multiple myeloma: differences in lesion conspicuity at short-tau inversion recovery and diffusion-weighted MRI. Br. J. Radiol. 2012; 85 (1016); 1102-1106.

3. Antoch G., Vogt F.M., Freudenberg L.S. et al. Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. J.A.M.A. 2003; 290: 3199-3206.

4. Shaefer J.F., Schlemmer H.P.W. Total-body MR imaging in oncology. Eur. Radiol. 2006; 16: 2000-2015.

5. Онкология: Национальное руководство; Под ред. В.И. Чиссова, М.И. Давыдова. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2008. 1060 с.

6. Even-Sapir E. Imaging of malignant bone involvement by morphologic, scintigraphic, and hybrid modalities. J. Nucl. Med. 2005; 46: 1356-1367.

7. Schmidt G.P, Reiser M.F., Baur-Melnyk A. et al. Whole-body imaging of the mu sculoskeletal system: the value of MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2007; 36: 1109-1119.

8. Soderlund V. Radiological diagnosis of skeletal metastases. Eur. Radiol. 1996; 6: 587-595.

9. Лишманова Ю.Б., Чернова В.И. Радионуклидная диагностика для практических врачей: Практическое руководство. Томск, 2004. 283 с.

10. Сергеев Н.И. Лучевые методы в диагностике метастатического поражения костной системы. Медицинская визуализация. 2011; 4: 46-51.

11. Chan Y., Chan K., Lam W. et al. Comparison of whole body MRI and radioisotope bone scintigram for skeletal metastases detection. Chin. Med. J. 1997; 110: 485-489.

12. Eustace S., Tello R., De Carvalho V. et al. A comparison of whole body turbo STIR MR imaging and planar 99m TC- methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1997; 169: 1655-1661.

13. Engelhard K., Hollenbach H.P, Wohlfart K. et al. Comparison of whole-body MRI with automatic moving table technique and bone scintigraphy for screening for bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Eur. Radiol. 2004; 14: 99-105.

14. Takenaka D., Ohno Y., Matsumoto K. et al. Detection of bone metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients: comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), whole-body MR imaging without and with DWI, whole-body FDG-PET/CT, and bone scintigraphy. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2009; 30: 298-308.

15. Venkitaraman R., Cook G.J., Dearnaley D.P et al. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of skeletal metastases in patients with prostate cancer. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2009; 53: 241-247.

16. Lauenstein T.C., Goehde S.C., Herborn C.U. et al. Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients for metastases. Radiology. 2004; 233: 139-148.

17. Frat A., Agildere M., Gencoglu A. et al. Value of whole-body turbo short inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging with panoramic table for detecting bone metastases. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2006; 30: 151-156.

18. Ghanem N., Kelly T., Altehoefer C. et al. Whole-body MRI in comparison to skeletal scintigraphy for detection of skeletal metastases in patients with solid tumors. Radiologe. 2004; 44: 864-873.

19. Sohaib S.A., Cook G., Allen S.D., Hughes M. Comparison of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy in the detection of bone metastases in renal cancer. Br. J. Radiol. 2009 Aug; 82(980); 632-639.

20. Liu T, Cheng T., Xu W. et al. A meta-analysis of 18FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40 (5); 523-531.

21. Qu X., Huang X., Yan W. et al. A meta-analysis of FDG-PET-CT, FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer. Eur. J. Radiol. 2012; 81 (5); 1007-1015.

22. Stecco A., Lombardi M., Leva L. et al. Diagnostic accuracy and agreement between whole-body diffusion MRI and bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastases. Radiol. Med. 2013; 118 (3): 465-475.

23. Steinborn M.M., Heuck A.F., Tiling R. et al. Whole-body bone marrow MRI in patients with metastatic disease to the skeletal system. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1999; 23 (1); 123-129.

24. Lauenstein T., Freudenberg L., Goehde S. et al. Whole-body MRI using a rolling table platform for the detection of bone metastases. Eur. Radiol. 2002; 12: 2091-2099.

25. Kwee T.C., Takahara T., Katahira K., Katsuyuki N. Whole-body MRI for Detecting Bone Marrow Metastases. PET Clinics. 2010; 5 (3): 297-309.

26. Lu S.S., Wang D.K., Li Y.J. et al. Whole-body MRI for detecting osseous metastases: comparison with bone scintigraphy. Chin. J. Radiol. 2011; 45: 459-462.


Review

For citations:


Sergeev N.I., Fomin D.K., Kotlyarov P.M., Nudnov N.V., Solodkiy V.A. Comparative Study of the Possibilities of Bone Scintigraphy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Whole Body in the Diagnosis of Bone Metastases. Medical Visualization. 2014;(4):107-113. (In Russ.)

Views: 956


ISSN 1607-0763 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9516 (Online)