Preview

Medical Visualization

Advanced search

MDCT in Imaging of Hyperperfusion Syndrome after Carotid Surgery

https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2017-3-20-31

Abstract

Aim: to assess MDCT abilities in imaging hyperperfusion syndrome (HPS) after carotid surgery.

Materials and methods. Cases of hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization were analyzed at 595 patients underwent surgery during 2012–2016. Preoperatively complex visualization: ultrasound imaging of brachiocephalic arteries and cerebral vessels, computer tomography of the brain, computed angiography (CTA) brachiocephalic arteries and cerebral vessels, perfusion computer tomography (PCT). Computer tomography was held with Philips iCT 256 slices. During CTA 50 ml on nonionic contrast media was injected (4–4.5 ml/sec flow) with further arterial and venous phases. PCT covered 6 sm (basal ganglia and cerebral hemispheres), 35 cycles with 2 sec interval. If HPS was considered all patients underwent CT: non-contrast brain imaging, CTA and PCT (in stable patient condition). Further dynamic imaging was made at MRI 3 Tl with standard sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, DWI).

Results. HPS was detected in 7 cases, all patients had characteristic clinical presentation. According to imaging data all patients could be divided in three groups. Diffuse hemispheric edema on the operation side – 3 cases, at follow up imaging – regression of changes. Hemorrhagic component – 2 patients, one – with small hemorrhagic focus, another – with massive intracerebral hematoma. In 2 cases there were no new cerebral lesions detected. At CTA and PCT – increase of cerebral flow after operation. Mortality in patients with HPS was 28% (2 patients). In other cases there was regress of clinical symptoms.

Conclusion. In all cases in our study the one was able to either to diagnose either to suggest HPS on the CT data. Detailed analyses of acquired data and comparison with clinical status were necessary, sometimes – follow up studies were essential. 

About the Author

M. V. Vishnyakova
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute
Russian Federation

Marina V. Vishnyakova – cand. of med. sci., senior research associate of radiological office of M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute,Moscow.

Scientific consultants: Pronin I.N. – doct. of med. sci., professor, Academician of the RAScie, deputy director for scientific work of academician N.N. Burdenko National Scientific and Practical Center of Neurosurgery of the Russian Federation Ministry of Health; Larkov R.N. – doct. of med. sci., head of vascular and ischemic heart disease surgery M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute.

Contact: Marina V. Vishnyakova – 129110, Moscow, Schepkina str., 61/2. 


References

1. Moulakakis K.G., Mylonas S.N., Sfyroeras G.S., Andrikopoulos V. Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization. J. Vasc. Surg. 2009; 49 (4): 1060–1068.

2. Morales Deza E.S., Santamarta E., Saiz Ayala A., Salgado Bernal A.L., Murias E., Vega Valdes P. Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome: an urgent complication with imagingbased diagnosis. ECR. 2014; C-2300: 25. DOI: 10.1594/ecr2014/C-2300.

3. Kim K.H., Lee C.-H., Son Y.-J., Yang H.-J., Chung Y.S., Lee S.H. Post-Carotid Endarterectomy Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome: Is It Preventable by Strict Blood Pressure Control? J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2013; 54: 159–163.

4. Strelkova Т.V., Airoyan A.G. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. Klinicheskaya phiziologiyz krovoobrascheniya. 2015; 3: 5–16. (In Russian)

5. Farooq M.U., Goshgarian C., Min J., Gorelick P.B. Pathophysiology and management of reperfusion injury and hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. Exp. Transl. Stroke Med. 2016; 8 (1): 7. DOI: 10.1186/s13231-016-0021-2.

6. Canovas D., Estela J., Perendreu J., Branera J., Rovira A., Martinez M., Gimenez-Gaibar A. Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Angioplasty. In: Angioplasty, Various Techniques and Challenges in Treatment of Congenital and Acquired Vascular Stenoses. Thomas Forbes (ed.). Published by In Tech, Croatia. 2012: 11–40.

7. Chang C.H., Chang T.Y., Chang Y.J., Huang K.L., Chin S.C., Ryu, S.J., Yang T.C., Lee T.H. The Role of Perfusion Computed Tomography in the Prediction of Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6 (5): e19886. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019886.

8. Lai Z.-C., Liu B., Chen Y., Ni L., Liu C.-W. Prediction of Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome with Velocity Blood Pressure Index. Chinese Med. J. 2015; 128 (12): 1611–1617. DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.158317.

9. Belyaev A.Yu. Syndrome of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy: Diss. … cand. of med. sci. Modcow, 2011. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Vishnyakova M.V. MDCT in Imaging of Hyperperfusion Syndrome after Carotid Surgery. Medical Visualization. 2017;(3):20-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2017-3-20-31

Views: 2361


ISSN 1607-0763 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9516 (Online)