Arterial blood supply to the liver, celiac and mesenteric pool (literature review)
N. A. Rubtsova,
M. N. Pheduleev,
Y. I. Nerestyuk,
D. K. Khamidov,
D. V. Sidorov,
M. V. Lozhkin,
A. D. Kaprin https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-928
Abstract
Knowledge of the variant vascular anatomy of the celiac and mesenteric basin is of paramount importance in operative interventions in the hepatopancreatobiliary zone, stomach and duodenum, liver transplantation. The article presents various classifications of vessels of the celiac and mesenteric basin, created by the authors as a result of numerous studies using various techniques. The main advantages and disadvantages of the main classifications of blood vessels are considered, the features of application in clinical practice are given.
About the Authors
N. A. Rubtsova
P. Hertsen Moscow oncology research institute, Branch of National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Rubtsova, Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Head of Radiology Department
3, 2nd Botlinsky proezd, Moscow, 125284
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study had no sponsorship.
M. N. Pheduleev
P. Hertsen Moscow oncology research institute, Branch of National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Mikhail N. Pheduleev, radiologist of CT and MRI Department
3, 2nd Botlinsky proezd, Moscow, 125284
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study had no sponsorship.
Y. I. Nerestyuk
P. Hertsen Moscow oncology research institute, Branch of National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Yaroslav I. Nerestyuk, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), radiologist of CT and MRI Department
3, 2nd Botlinsky proezd, Moscow, 125284
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study had no sponsorship.
D. K. Khamidov
P. Hertsen Moscow oncology research institute, Branch of National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Daler K. Khamidov, radiologist of CT and MRI Department
3, 2nd Botlinsky proezd, Moscow, 125284
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study had no sponsorship.
D. V. Sidorov
P. Hertsen Moscow oncology research institute, Branch of National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Dmitriy V. Sidorov, Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Abdominal Department
3, 2nd Botlinsky proezd, Moscow, 125284
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study had no sponsorship.
M. V. Lozhkin
P. Hertsen Moscow oncology research institute, Branch of National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Mikhail V. Lozhkin, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), doctor of the Abdominal Department
3, 2nd Botlinsky proezd, Moscow, 125284
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study had no sponsorship.
A. D. Kaprin
P. Hertsen Moscow oncology research institute, Branch of National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of Russia; The Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Andrey D. Kaprin, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Corresponding member of Russian Academy of Education, Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Chief urologist of the Russian Academy of Sciences, General Director of “National Medical Radiological Research Center” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (3, 2nd Botlinsky proezd, Moscow, 125284), Head of Department of urology and surgical nephrology with a course of oncourology at the medical faculty of medical institute of The Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (6, Miklukho-Maklay str., Moscow 117198)
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study had no sponsorship.
References
1. Balakhnin P.V., Tarazov P.G., Polikarpov A.A., Suvorova J.V., Kozlov A.V. Long-term regional chemotherapy for metastases of colorectal cancer in the liver. The importance of arterial anatomy for the surgical installation of implantable infusion systems. Problems in oncology. 2003; 49: 50: 588–594. (In Russian)
2. Balakhnin P.V., Tarazov P.G., Polikarpov A.A., Suvorova Yu.V., Kozlov A.V. The angiographic evaluated of the hepatic arterial anatomy variations in 1511 patients. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB surgery. 2004; 9: 2: 14–21. (In Russian)
3. Vishnevsky V.A., Kubyshkin V.A., Zhao A.V., Ikramov R.Z. Surgery on the liver. M.: Miklos, 2003. 156 p. (In Russian)
4. Galyan T.N. Angioarchitectonics and biliary anatomy of the liver of a related donor according to multispiral computed and magnetic resonance imaging: Dis. ... Cand. of Sci. (Med.). Moscow, 2011. 24 p. (In Russian)
5. Allen P.J., Stojadinovic A., Ben-Porat L., Gonen M., Kooby D., Blumgart L., Paty P., Fong Y. The management of variant arterial anatomy during hepatic arterial infusion pump placement. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2002; 9 (9): 875–880. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557524
6. Covey A.M., Brody L.A., Maluccio M.A., Getrajdman G.I., Brown K.T. Variant hepatic arterial anatomy revisited: Digital subtraction angiography performed in 600 patients. Radiology. 2002; 224: 2: 542–547. http://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2242011283
7. Hiatt J.R., Gabbay J., Busuttil R.W. Surgical anatomy of the hepatic arteries in 1000 cases. Ann. Surg. 1994; 220: 1: 50–52. http://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199407000-00008
8. Koops A., Wojciechowski B., Broering D.C., Adam G., Krupski-Berdien G. Anatomic variations of the hepatic arteries in 604 selective celiac and superior mesenteric angiographies. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2004; 26 (3): 239–244. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0229-z
9. Michels N.A. Blood supply and anatomy of the upper abdominal organs with a descriptive atlas. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1955.
10. Nebesar R.A., Kornblith P.L., Pollard J.J., Michels N.A. Celiac and superior mesenteric artery a correlation of angiograms and dissections. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1969. 228 p.
11. Rong G.H., Sindekir W.F. Aberrant peripancreatic arterial anatomy: Consideration in performing pancreatectomy for malignant neoplasms. Am. Surg. 1987; 53: 12: 726–729.
12. Rygaard H., Forrest M., MygingТ., Baden H. Anatomic variants of the hepatic arteries. Acta Radiol. Diagn. 1986; 27: 4: 425–427.
13. De Santis M., Ariosi P., Calò G.F., Romagnoli R. Anatomia vascolare arteriosa epatica e sue varianti [Hepatic arterial vascular anatomy and its variants]. Radiol. Med. 2000; 100 (3): 145–151. (In Italian)
14. Winston C.B., Lee N.A., Jarnagin W.R., Teitcher J., DeMatteo R.P., Fong Y., Blumgart L.H. CT angiography for delineation of celiac and superior mesenteric artery variants in patients undergoing hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007; 189 (1): W13–19. http://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.1374
15. Kubyshkin V.A., Vishnevsky V.A. Pancreas cancer. M.: Medpraktika, 2003. 380 p. (In Russian)
16. Starostina N.S. MSCT angiography to detect aberrant arteries and collaterals of the celiac-mesenteric basin before and after pancreatic surgery with resection of the main arteries without reconstruction: Dis. ... Cand. of Sci. (Med.). Moscow, 2015. 24 p. (In Russian)
17. Haller A. Icones anatomicae quibus praecipuae aliquae partes corporis humani delineatae proponuntur and arteriarum potissimum historia. Vandenhoeck. Gottingen, 1756.
18. Adachi B. Das Arteriensystem der Japaner. Kyoto: Kenkyusha Press, 1928.
19. Luzha D. X-ray anatomy of the vascular system. Budapest: Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1973. 386 p.
20. Borisova E.L. The study of variant anatomy of the hepatic arteries using MSCT on the example of 200 studies. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology (REJR). 2013, 3 (3): 84–90. (In Russian)
21. Egorov V.I., Yashina N.I., Karmazanovsky G.G., Fedorov A.V. CT angiography as a reliable method for verifying diseases, structural options, and postoperative changes in the arteries of the celiac-mesenterial pool. Medical Visualization. 2009, 3: 82–94. (In Russian)
22. Kopchak V.M., Usenko A.Yu., Kopchak K.V., Zelinsky A.I. Surgical anatomy of the pancreas. Kiev, 2011. (In Russian)
23. Yi S.Q., Li J., Terayama H., Naito M., Iimura A., Itoh M. A rare case of inferior mesenteric artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery, with a review of the review of the literature. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2008; 30 (2):159–165. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0298-x
24. Osawa T., Feng X.Y., Sasaki N., Nagato S., Matsumoto Y., Onodera M., Nara E., Fujimura A., Nozaka Y. Rare case of the inferior mesenteric artery and the common hepatic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery. Clin. Anat. 2004; 17 (6): 518–521. http://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10234
25. Egorov V.I., Yashina N.I., Fedorov A.V., Vishnevsky V.A., Karmazanovsky G.G., Shevchenko T.V. Arterial wholemesenteric aberrations: comparison of operational data and CT angiography. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zhurnal imeni N.I. Pirogova. 2009; 11: 4–9. (In Russian)
26. Song S.Y., Chung J.W., Yin Y.H., Jae H.J., Kim H.C., Jeon U.B., Cho B.H., So Y.H., Park J.H. Celiac axis and common hepatic artery variations in 5002 patients: systematic analysis with spiral CT and DSA. Radiology. 2010; 255 (1): 278–288. http://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090389
27. Noussios G., Dimitriou I., Chatzis I., Katsourakis A. The Main Anatomic Variations of the Hepatic Artery and Their Importance in Surgical Practice: Review of the Literature. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2017; 9 (4): 248–252. http://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2902w
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Rubtsova N.A., Pheduleev M.N., Nerestyuk Y.I., Khamidov D.K., Sidorov D.V., Lozhkin M.V., Kaprin A.D. Arterial blood supply to the liver, celiac and mesenteric pool (literature review). Medical Visualization. 2021;25(2):74-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-928
Views:
2458
Email this article 