Medical imaging of textile iatrogenic foreign bodies in abdomen and pelvis
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2019-4-100-113
Abstract
Aim. To systematize modern literature data on medical imaging of textile iatrogenic foreign bodies.
Materials and methods. We analyzed the articles about the identification of textile iatrogenic foreign bodies, published until 2019.
Discussion. Foreign body detection should be included in the differential diagnostic algorithm for patients who have a history of surgical interventions and unexplained symptoms. In all cases of suspected iatrogenic foreign body, it is desirable to use at least two available techiques of medical imaging: ultrasound, X-ray, MDCT, MRI.
Conclusions. Left foreign body entails medical and legal consequences that adversely affect both the reputation of the surgeon and the reputation of the medical institution, as they are considered a classic example of iatrogenic damage and indicate a violation of the quality standards of medical care. The article presents data on the features of medical imaging of textile iatrogenic foreign bodies left in the patient’s body as a result of planned and emergency surgical interventions, and determining the optimal tactics for examination and treatment of this category of patients.
About the Authors
A. A. Ryazantsev
Research clinical center of JSC “Russian Railways”; Russian medical academy continuous professional education
Russian Federation
Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of ultrasound diagnostics department; Professor of ultrasound diagnostics department
Russian Federation
Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of ultrasound diagnostics department; Professor of ultrasound diagnostics department
A. L. Yudin
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, head of radiology department
Russian Federation
Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, head of radiology department
E. A. Yumatova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, radiology department
1, Ostrovitianova str., Moscow, 117997
Phone: +7-903-779-43-83
References
1. Kazaryan V. M. Postoperative foreign bodies of the abdominal cavity. Medical and legal aspects. Forensic medical examination: scientific and practical journal. 2008; 51 (5): 33–35. (In Russian)
2. Timerbulatov V.M., Timerbulatov Sh.V. Ensuring safe surgery. Clinical and experimental surgery. Electronic scientific and practical journal: 16.03.15. http://jecs.ru/view/450.html. (In Russian)
3. Sherlock W., Dooley J.M. diseases of the liver and biliary tract: Practical guide: Per. with English. Eds Aprosimov Z.G., Mukhina N. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2002. 854 p. (In Russian)
4. Yarema I.V., Kazaryan V.M., Nakhaev V.I. et al. Postoperative iatrogenic foreign bodies of the abdominal cavity: crime or unintentional harm? Surgeon. 2010; 2: 63–67. (In Russian)
5. AORN Recommended Practices for Prevention of Retained Surgical Items (2012). Available at: http://www1.ucirvinehealth.org/magnetnursing/clienthtml/69/attachmentsand-reference-documents/118/SE2EOa.pdf
6. Abdominal surgery: National leadership. Short edition. Eds I.I. Zatevakhin, A.I. Kirienko, V.A. Kubyshkin. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2016. 912 p. (In Russian)
7. Demidov V.N. Ultrasound diagnostics of foreign bodies of pelvic localization and internal genitals. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012; 1: 69–73. (In Russian)
8. Ray S., Das K. Gossypiboma presented as abdominal lump seven years after open cholecystectomy. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2011; 8 (2): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/2011.8.2
9. Gostishchev V.K. Clinical operative purulent surgery: Guide. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2016. 448 p. (In Russian)
10. Ultrasound examination in emergency medicine. Eds O.J. Madge. Mather, M. Blaves: per with English. Moscow: “BINOM knowledge Laboratory”. 2nd eds. 2012. 512 p. (In Russian)
11. Memon A.S., Khan N.A., Samo K.A. et al. Assigning Responsibility for Gossypiboma (Abdominal Retained Surgical Sponges) in Operating Room. Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi. 2012; 6 (3): 106–109.
12. Yagmur Y., Akbulut S., Gumus S. Post Cholecystectomy Gossypiboma Mimicking a Liver Hydatid Cyst: Comprehensive Literature Review. Iran Red. Crescent. Med. J. 2015; 17 (4):. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.17(4)2015.22001
13. Oncology: National leadership. Short edition. Ed. Davydov M.I. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2013. 576 p. (In Russian)
14. Ognerubov N.Ah. Unintentional intraoperative abandonment of foreign bodies: legal aspects and prevention. Bulletin of TSU. 2015; 149 (9): 206–210. (In Russian)
15. Ryazantsev A.A., Goncharova T.P. Diagnosis of iatrogenic foreign bodies in the early and late postoperative period. Ultrasonic & functional diagnostics. 2013; 1: 15–26. (In Russian)
16. Benedict V. Postoperative extraneous TRACELEVEL cavity causes, diagnosis, treatment. Kharkov surgical school. 2013; 62 (5): 94–98. (In Ukrainian)
17. Biswas S., Ganguly S., Saha M.L. et al. Gossypiboma and Surgeon. Current Medicolegal Aspect A Review. Indian J. Surg. 2012; 74 (4): 318–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0446-3
18. Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. 16th ed. Eds M. Courtney, Jr. Townsend, R. Daniel Beauchamp et al. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 2001. 1674 p.
19. Kuznetsov N.A. Sinyakova M.V., Kharitonov S.V. et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of foreign bodies in the abdominal cavity. Surgery. 2001; 10: 21–23. (In Russian)
20. Gerych I.D., Vashchuk V.V. Barvinsky A.S. et al. Gossom as custom surgical complication. Hospital surgery. 2013; 2: 30–34. (In Ukrainian)
21. Cheon J.W., Kim E.Y., Kim K.Y., Park J.B., Shin Y.K., Kim K.Y., Chae H.D.A Case of Gossypiboma Masquerading as a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor. Clin. Endosc. 2011; 44: 51–54. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2011.44.1.51
22. Andreev A.V., Prihodko A.G., Sakhno V.D., Shamakhyan К.А., Izmaylova L.G., Bedrosov D.S. Ultrasound diagnostics of textile foreign bodies of the abdominal cavity. Medical Visualization. 2009; 2: 68–72. (In Russian)
23. Ivanov Yu.V. Forgotten foreign bodies during abdominal operations: accident or inevitability. Clinical practice. 2011; 2: 71–74. (In Russian)
24. Singhal B.M., Kumar V., Kaval S., Singh C. Spontaneous intraluminal migration of gossypiboma with intestinal obstruction. OA Case Reports. 2013; 2 (15): 145.
25. Sistla S.Ch., Ramesh A., Karthikeyan V.S., Ram D., Ali S.M., Subramaniam R.V.S. Gossypi boma presenting as coloduodenal fistula - Report of a rare case with review of literature. Int. Surg. 2014; 99: 126–131. https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-13-00057.1
26. Haque A., Quraishi M. Beyond a Gossypiboma. Corporation Case Reports in Surgery. 2012: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/263841
27. Topal F., Akbulut S., Dinçer N., Topçu Ç., Yılmaz Ş., Sarıkaya H., Yönem Ö., Topal F.E. Intra-abdominal gossypiboma. Cumhuriyet Med. J. 2011; 33: 239–242.
28. Karakaya M.A., Koç O., Ekiz F., Ağaçhan A.F. Approach of forensic medicine to gossypiboma. Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2015; 31: 78–80. https://doi.org/10.5152/ucd.2015.2728
29. O’Connor A., Coakley F., Meng M., Eberhardt S. Imaging of retained surgical sponges in the abdomen and pelvis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003; 180: 481–489. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800481
30. Alis H., Soylu A., Dolay K., Kalaycı M., Ciltas A. Surgical intervention may not always be required in gossypiboma with intraluminal migration. Wld J. Gastroenterol. 2007; 13: 6605–6607. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.13.6605
31. Shyung L.R., Chang W.H., Lin S.C., Shih S.C., Kao C.R., Chou S.Y. Report of gossypiboma from the standpoint in medicine and law. Wld J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11: 1248– 1249. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i8.1248
32. Dan D., Ramraj P., Solomon V., Leron O., Ramnarine M., Deonarine K., Naraynsingh V., Bascombe N. Gossypiboma Presenting as an Atypical Intra-Abdominal Cyst: Case Report. Health. 2014; 6: 2499–2504. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2014.618287
33. Garg M., Aggarwal A.D. A Review of Medicolegal Consequences of Gossypiboma. J. Indian Acad. Forensic Med. 2010; 32: 358–361.
34. das Chagas Neto F.A., Agnollitto P.M., Mauad F.M., Barreto A.R.F., Muglia V.F., Elias J. Jr. Imaging findings of abdominal gossypibomas. Radiol. Bras. 2012; 45 (1): 53–58.
35. Kobayashi T., Miyakoshi N., Abe E., Abe T., Suzuki T., Takahashi M., Shimada Y. Gossypiboma 19 years after laminectomy mimicking a malignant spinal tumour: a case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2014; 8 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-311
36. Belen’kaya O.I., Yudin A.L. Variants of a computed tomographic picture of gossipiboma. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2012; 6 (3):13–18. (In Russian)
37. Lu Y.Y., Cheung Y.C., Ko S.F., Ng S.H. Calcified reticulate rind sign: a characteristic feature of gossypiboma on computed tomography. Wld J. Gastroenterol. 2005; 11: 4927–4929. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i31.4927
38. Choi B.I., Kim S.H., Yu E.S., Chung H.S., Han M.C., Kim C.W. Retained surgical sponge: diagnosis with CT and sonography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1988; 150:1047–1050. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.150.5.1047
39. Kokubo T., Itai Y., Ohtomo K., Yoshikawa K., Iio M., Atomi Y. Retained surgical sponges: CT and US appearance. Radiology. 1987; 165: 415–418. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.165.2.3310095
40. Kopka L., Fischer U., Gross A.J., Funke M., Oestmann J.W., Grabbe E. CT of retained surgical sponges (textilomas): pitfalls in detection and evaluation. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1996; 20: 919–923. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/00004728-199611000-00009
41. Rajput A., Loud P.A., Gibbs J.F., Kraybill W.G. Diagnostic challenges in patients with tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003; 21: 3700–3701.
42. Manzella A., Filho P.B., Albuquerque E., Farias F., Kaercher J. Imaging of Gossypibomas: Pictorial Review. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009; 193: S94–S101.
43. Yuh-Feng T., Chin-Chu W., Cheng-Tau S., Min-Tsung T. FDG PET CT features of an intraabdominal gossypiboma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2005; 30: 561–563. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/01.rlu.0000170227.56173.2f
44. Haegeman S., Maleux G., Heye S., Daenens K. Textiloma complicated by abscess-formation, three years after surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. JBRBTR. 2008; 91:51–53.
45. Gencosmanoglu R, Inceoglu R. An unusual cause of small bowel obstruction: gossypiboma – case report. BMC Surg. 2003; 3: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-3-6
Review
For citations:
Ryazantsev A.A., Yudin A.L., Yumatova E.A. Medical imaging of textile iatrogenic foreign bodies in abdomen and pelvis. Medical Visualization. 2019;(4):100-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2019-4-100-113
Views:
2176
Email this article 