Standartization of ultrasound examination of the pelvic organs in women
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2018-5-84-93
Abstract
Introduction. In Russia, there has been no research comparing data obtained by ultrasound scanners of different firms, with a comprehensive assessment of pelvic organs in women.
Purpose of the study. Compare the results of the study of the internal genitalia of healthy women, obtained on devices from Philips and GE Healthcare.
Materials and methods. A comparison of the results of pelvic ultrasound examination in healthy patients of reproductive age (18–45 years), conducted on the expert level devices of GE Healthcare (Austria) and Philips (Netherlands) by the same doctor. Each group consisted of 30 people (15 women in the first and second phase of the cycle). Age did not have significant differences (p > 0.05). Organometry (uterine volume, endometrial thickness, ovarian volume), dopplerometric parameters of blood flow in uterine arteries, such as maximum systolic and average blood flow rate (Vmax, Vmean), uterine artery diameter, arterial perfusion index (API) was calculated, vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization-flow index (VFI) of the uterus and endometrium were obtained in 3D Doppler.
Summary. When implementing new techniques should study the information about this method and rely on the regulatory parameters obtained on the devices of similar firms.
About the Author
I. A. Ozerskaya
Russian Peoples' Friendship University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
doct. of med. sci., Professor, Department of ultrasound diagnostics and surgery of the Faculty training of health workers
Miklukho-Maklay str., 21, bldg. 3, Moscow, Russia, 117198. People's Friendship University, Department of ultrasound diagnostics and surgery.
+7-926-606-09-05
References
1. Gabliya M.Yu. Unification of ultrasound protocols of the prostate gland. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw6k-Kuer3M (In Russian)
2. Vetsheva N.N. Standardization of methods for conducting ultrasound research. http://event.medradiology.moscow/d/1387577/d/standartizatsiya_metodik_provedeniya_uz_issledovaniy_vetshevann.pdf (In Russian)
3. http://www.rasudm.org/recomendation/ (In Russian)
4. Zubarev A.R. Standards of ultrasonic phlebology. https://mks.ru/library/conf/angiodop/2000/angiol/zub2.html (In Russian)
5. Recommendations for the shear wave elastography ultrasound machines for Phillips Company// http://www.rasudm.org/recomendation/details.htm?id=15 (In Russian)
6. Raine-Fenning N.J., Nordin N.M., Ramnarine K.V., Campbell B.K., Clewes J.S., Perkins A., Johnson I.R. Evaluation of the effect of machine settings on quantitative three-dimensional power Doppler angiography: an in-vitro flow phantom experiment. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 32 (4): 551–559. DOI: 10.1002/uog.6138.
7. Gabliya M.Yu. Unification of ultrasound protocols of the prostate gland. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw6k-Kuer3M (In Russian)
8. Omran E., El-Sharkawy M., El-Mazny A., Hammam M., Ramadan W., Latif D., Samir D., Sobh S. Effect of clomiphene citrate on uterine hemodynamics in women with unexplained infertility. Int. J. Womens Health. 2018; 10: 147–152. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S155335.
9. http://www.rasudm.org/recomendation/ (In Russian)
10. Dong Y., Cai Y., Zhang Y., Xing Y., Sun Y. The effect of fertility stress on endometrial and subendometrial blood flow among infertile women. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2017; 15: 15–26.
11. Recommendations for the shear wave elastography ultrasound machines for Phillips Company// http://www.rasudm.org/recomendation/details.htm?id=15 (In Russian)
12. El-Mazny A., Kamel A., Ramadan W., Gad-Allah S., Abdelaziz S., Hussein A.M. Effect of ovarian endometrioma on uterine and ovarian blood flow in infertile women. Int. J. Womens Health. 2016; 8: 677–682. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S124229
13. Raine-Fenning N.J., Nordin N.M., Ramnarine K.V., Campbell B.K., Clewes J.S., Perkins A., Johnson I.R. Evaluation of the effect of machine settings on quantitative three-dimensional power Doppler angiography: an in-vitro flow phantom experiment. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 32 (4): 551–559. DOI: 10.1002/uog.6138.
14. El-Mazny A., Ramadan W., Kamel A., Gad-Allah S. Effect of hydrosalpinx on uterine and ovarian hemodynamics in women with tubal factor infertility. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016; 199: 55–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.046.
15. Omran E., El-Sharkawy M., El-Mazny A., Hammam M., Ramadan W., Latif D., Samir D., Sobh S. Effect of clomiphene citrate on uterine hemodynamics in women with unexplained infertility. Int. J. Womens Health. 2018; 10: 147–152. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S155335.
16. Vanden Bosch T., Dueholm M., Valentin L., Rasmussen C.K., Votino A., Van Schoubroeck D., Landolfo C., Install AJ, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C., Gordts S., Benacerraf B., D'Hooghe T., De Moor B., Br lmann H., Goldstein S., Epstein E., Bourne T., Timmerman D. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 46 (3): 284–298. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14806.
17. Dong Y., Cai Y., Zhang Y., Xing Y., Sun Y. The effect of fertility stress on endometrial and subendometrial blood flow among infertile women. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2017; 15: 15–26.
18. Leone F. P., Timmerman D., Bourne T., Valentin L., Epstein E., Goldstein S.R., Marret H., Parsons A.K., Gull B., Istre O., Sepulveda W., Ferrazzi E., Van den Bosch T. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: a consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 35 (1): 103–112. DOI: 10.1002/uog.7487.
19. El-Mazny A., Kamel A., Ramadan W., Gad-Allah S., Abdelaziz S., Hussein A.M. Effect of ovarian endometrioma on uterine and ovarian blood flow in infertile women. Int. J. Womens Health. 2016; 8: 677–682. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S124229
20. Timmerman D., Valentin L., Bourne T., Collins W.P., Verrelst H., Vergote I.; International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of adnexal tumor: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 16 (c): 500–505. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00287.x
21. El-Mazny A., Ramadan W., Kamel A., Gad-Allah S. Effect of hydrosalpinx on uterine and ovarian hemodynamics in women with tubal factor infertility. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016; 199: 55–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.046.
22. Vanden Bosch T., Dueholm M., Valentin L., Rasmussen C.K., Votino A., Van Schoubroeck D., Landolfo C., Install AJ, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C., Gordts S., Benacerraf B., D'Hooghe T., De Moor B., Br lmann H., Goldstein S., Epstein E., Bourne T., Timmerman D. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 46 (3): 284–298. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14806.
23. Leone F. P., Timmerman D., Bourne T., Valentin L., Epstein E., Goldstein S.R., Marret H., Parsons A.K., Gull B., Istre O., Sepulveda W., Ferrazzi E., Van den Bosch T. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: a consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 35 (1): 103–112. DOI: 10.1002/uog.7487.
24. Timmerman D., Valentin L., Bourne T., Collins W.P., Verrelst H., Vergote I.; International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of adnexal tumor: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 16 (c): 500–505. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00287.x
Review
For citations:
Ozerskaya I.A. Standartization of ultrasound examination of the pelvic organs in women. Medical Visualization. 2018;(5):84-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2018-5-84-93
Views:
2424
Email this article 