Modern Radiodiagnostics Technology of Metastasises in Pelvic Lymph Nodes
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2017-6-100-108
Abstract
The analysis of the diagnostic informativeness of modern radiodiagnosticis methods in determining metastatic lymph node of pelvic cancer gynecological organs according to domestic and foreign publications. At the present stage methods of obtaining visual images pelvic lymph nodes are radiodiagnostics technologies (radiological, ultrasound, magnetic resonance tomography, scintigraphic). The analysis has shown that the researches devoted to diagnostic informational content of modern methods of radiodiagnosis in a differentiation of nature of damage of pelvic lymph nodes aren't enough. According to the literature, the most rational and perspective method for radiodiagnosis metastatics lymph node is a magnetic resonance imaging due to the high information content and thus specificity. At the same time, the continued relevance of further study of methods of radiodiagnostics in order to find the optimal one for the assessment of pelvic lymph nodes.
About the Authors
V. N. Diomidova
I.N. Ulyanov The Chuvash state university; The City Clinical Hospital №1
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valentina N. Diomidova – doct. of med. sci., professor, the head of the Department of the Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases department with a course of radiodiagnosis of The I.N. Ulyanov ChSU; the head of Department of ultrasound diagnostics at CCH №1.
CheboksariO. A. Еfimova
The Republican Clinical Oncological Hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oksana A. Efimova – radiologist in a Republican Clinical Oncological Hospital; Рostgraduate student of the I.N. Ulyanov ChSU.
37-23, Traktorostroiteley, Cheboksary, 428000, Phone: 8-952-024-18-74References
1. Petrenko V.M. Anatomy and development of lymphatic system. SPb.: SPbGMA, 2001. 46 p. (In Russian)
2. Itkin G.P., Itkin M.G. Is the lymphatic system – a forgotten area? Vestnik transplantologii i iskusstvennykh organov. 2016; 18 (3): 145–151. (In Russian)
3. Borodin Yu.I. Lymphology in Siberia. People and problems. Byulleten' SO RAMN. 2012; 32 (1): 107–116. (In Russian)
4. Ovchinnikov V.A. Visualization defeat of lymph node. Zhurnal GrGMU. 2006; 4: 16–20. (In Russian)
5. Minyukova T.N. Radial methods of research of patients with lymphoproliferative diseases. Vestnik rentgenologii i radiologii. 2006; 6: 45–51. (In Russian)
6. Shavladze Z.N., Berezovskaya T.P., Proshin A.A. Clinical diagnostic aspects of magnetic resonance imaging for staging of cervical cancer. Medical Visualization. 2009; 5: 80–90. (In Russian)
7. Rudbeck O. Anatomica. Arosia: Eucharius Lauringer, 1653. 24 p.
8. Bartolinus T. Anatomia. Hague: Ex typographia Adriani Vlacq, 1655. 807 p.
9. Iosifov G.M. Human lymphatic system. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo Universiteta, 1914. 180 p. (In Russian)
10. Zhdanov D.A. General anatomy and physiology of lymphatic system. L.: Medgiz, 1952. 336 p. (In Russian)
11. Sapin M. R., Yurina N.A., Etingen L.E. Lymph node. M.: Meditsina, 1978. 267 p. (In Russian)
12. Sapin M.R. New view on lymphatic system and its place in protective functions of an organism. Morfologiya. 1997; 5: 84–87. (In Russian)
13. Petrenko V.M. Structural bases of a lymphatic outflow (sketches on functional anatomy of a lymphatic system). SPb.: SPbGMA, 1999. 120 p. (In Russian)
14. Borodin Yu.I., Trufakin V.A., Lyubarskiy M.S., Efremov A.V., Rot G.Z. Sketches on a clinical limfologiya. Novosibirsk: Sibirskoe otdelenie RAMN, 2001. 191 p. (In Russian)
15. Trofimova T.N., Karabanovich E.V., Karlova N.A., Boytsova M.G. From Rentgen through the centuries. Luchevaya diagnostika i terapiya. 2015; 4 (6): 107–112. (In Russian)
16. Kinmonth J.B., Kemp Harper R.A., Taylor G.W. Lymphangiography by radiological methods. J. Faculty Radiol. Faculty of Radiologists (Great Britain). 1955; 6: 217–223.
17. Francis G.E., Kinmonth J.B., Rollinson E.R., Rotblat J., Taylor G.W. Lymphatic Circulation Studied with Radioactive Plasma Protein. Br. Med. J. 1957; 1: 133–137.
18. Ivanov A.E., Amosov V.I. Research methods lymphatic drainage from the chest and regional lymph nodes with lymphadenopathy various etiologies. @Regionarnoe krovoobrashchenie i mikrotsirkulyatsiya@. 2017; 16 (2): 54–62. (In Russian)
19. Zadgenidze G.A., Tsyb A.F. Clinical lymphography. Akademiya meditsinskikh nauk SSSR. M.: Meditsina, 1977. 288 p. (In Russian)
20. Fomin D.K., Pyatnitskiy I.A. Modern instrumental methods of investigation of the functional status of the lymph nodes in women who had undergone radical surgery for malignant tumors of the small pelvis (Review of the Literature). Vestnik Rossiyskogo nauchnogo tsentra rentgenologii Minzdrava Rossii. 2015; 2: 11–24. (In Russian)
21. Amosov V.I., Katsev V.M., Dmitrieva L.A., Lapekin S.V. Lymphoscintigraphy of the lower limbs: the diagnostic possibilities of the method. Regionarnoe krovoobrashchenie i mikrotsirkulyatsiya. 2002; 1 (3): 48–52. (In Russian)
22. Mikhaylov A.I., Tyurin I.E., Panov V.O. Magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of lymphomas. Vestnik rentgenologii i radiologii. 2014; 2: 60–67. (In Russian)
23. Sage H.H., Sinha B.K., Kizilay D., Toulon R. Radioactive colloidal gold measurements of lymph flow and functional patterns of lymphatics and lymph nodes in the extremities. J. Nucl. Med. 1964; 5: 626–642.
24. Cutini G., Gesuelli G.C., Sartelli M., Brianzoni E., Musolino G., Nestori M., Scibй R., Berbellini A. The role of lymphoscintigraphy in rectal laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 2001; 15 (12): 1440–1443.
25. Smelov S.V., Diomidova V.N., Zakharova O.V., Merkulova L.M., Safonova M.A., Ionov A.M. Magneticresonanse-tomographic anatomy of structures of a female basin: educational visual aid. Cheboksary: Izd-vo Chuvashskogo universiteta, 2015. 80 p. (In Russian)
26. Letyagin A.Yu. Magnetic resonance methods of a research of lymphatic system. In: Limfologiya. Konenkov V.I., Borodin Yu.I., Lyubarsky M.S. Novosibirsk: Filial Geo Izdatel'stva SO RAN, Izdatel'skiy dom Manuskript, 2012: 326–344. (In Russian)
27. Diomidova V.N., Valeeva O.V., Zakharova O.V., Konkova M.V., Ishchenko A.I., Chameeva T.V., Semenova E.N. The possibility of an integrated ultrasound in the diagnosis of benign diseases of the uterus and its appendages. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta. 2013; 3: 415–421. (In Russian)
28. Diomidova V.N., Zakharova O.V., Petrova O.V., Siordiya A.A. Ultrasound elastography (compression and shear waves) in obstetrics and gynecology. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2016; 15 (2): 52–58. (In Russian)
29. Borsukov A.V., Morozova T.G., Kovalev A.V., Safronova M.A., Ivanov Yu.V., Kazakova O.P., Experience of implementation of recommendations for a standardized method kopressionnoy sonoelastography superficial organs and structure. Medical Visualization. 2014; 4: 122–131. (In Russian)
30. Rubtsova N.A., Novikova E.G., Sinitsyn V.E. The possibilities of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of regional lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer and endometrium. Medical Visualization. 2012; 5: 63–72. (In Russian)
31. Tyutin L.A., Kostenikov N.A., Il'in N.V., Khodzhibekova M.M., Vinogradova Yu.N. Positron emission tomography with 18F-FDG in the complex radiation diagnosis of patients with malignant lymphomas. STM. 2011; 2: 120–126. (In Russian)
32. Letyagin A.Yu. High field magnetic resonance imaging pathological changes of lymph nodes. Luchevaya diagnostika i terapiya. 2011; 4 (2): 59–72. (In Russian)
33. Kotlyarov P.M., Primak N.V., Flerov K.E., Gombolevskiy V.A., Ochinikov V.I., Nudnov N.V. MSCT in the diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes in colon cancer. Medical Visualization. 2013; 5: 93–101. (In Russian)
34. Khoruzhik S.A., Zhavdin E.A., Karman A.V. Capabilities of the diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in early prediction of the effectiveness of chemotherapy lymphomas. Vsenatsional'naya akademiya nauk Belarussii. 2014; 2: 107–120. (In Russian)
35. Stepanova Yu.A. Diagnostics not organ behind peritoneum tumours according to complex ultrasonography: Avtoref. diss. ... cand. of med. sci. M., 2002. 30 p. (In Russian)
36. Chissov V.I., Trofimova E.Yu. Ultrasound examination of lymph nodes in oncology. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. M.: Strom, 2003. 109 p. (In Russian)
37. Esen G. Ultrasound of superficial lymph nodes. Eur. J. Radiol. 2006; 58 (3): 345–359.
38. Trofimova E.Yu. Ultrasound examination of the lymph nodes. SonoAce International. 2008; 18: 59–64. (In Russian)
39. Letyagin A.Yu. Limfoadenopatic changes on magnetic resonance tomographs. Meditsinskiy zhurnal Zapadnogo Kazakhstana. 2012; 4 (36): 17–21. (In Russian)
40. Cheremisin V.M., Glushkov N.I., Pavelets K.V., Musukaev Kh.M., Chernykh D.A. The role of radiological methods in the selection of surgical treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Medical Visualization. 2009; 5: 74–79. (In Russian)
41. Berezovskaya T.P., Nevol'skikh A.A., Berdov B.A., Kondrashova L.M., Gorban' N.A.. Possibilities of MRI in the diagnosis of metastatic involvement of regional lymph nodes in rectal cancer. Koloproktologiya. 2013; 3 (45): 3–9. (In Russian)
42. Usova A.V., Frolova I.G., Afanas'ev S.G., Tarasova A.S. Possibilities of MRI in the diagnosis and assessment of the effectiveness of treatment of colorectal cancer. Sibirskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal. 2012; 5 (53): 74–79. (In Russian)
43. Efimova O.A., Safonova M.A., Ionov A.M. Search the optimal algorithm of radiation diagnosis of early ovarian cancer. Acta Medica Eurasica. 2017; 1: 37–47. (In Russian)
44. Novitskiy A.V., Tyrenko V.V., Boykov I.V., Gornostaev D.A. The results of applying the combined and positron emission computed tomography in the staging of patients with malignant lymphomas. Medline. ru. Rossiyskiy biomeditsinskiy zhurnal. 2011; 12: 598–609. (In Russian)
45. Hubner K.F., McDonald T.W., Niethammer J.G. Smith GT, Gould HR, Buonocore E. Assessment of primary and metastatic ovarian cancer by positron emission tomography (PET) using 2-[18F]deoxyglucose (2-[18F] FDG). Gynecol. oncol. 1993; 51 (2): 197–204.
46. Chung Y.An., Kim S.H., Sohn H.S., Chung S.K., Rhim Ch. Ch., Namkoong S.E. Usefulness of lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma detection in the identification of sentinel nodes in cervical cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Molec. Imaging. 2003; 30: 1014–1017.
47. Torizuka T., Kanno T.O., Futatsubashi M., Okada H., Yoshikawa E., Nakamura F., Takekuma M., Maeda M., Ouchi Y. Imaging of gynecologic tumors: comparison of (11)C-cloline PET with (18)F-FDG PET. J. Nucl. Med. 2003; 44 (7): 1051–1056.
48. Efimova O.A. Complex radiation diagnosis of ovarian tumor formations in the preoperative stage. Povolzhskiy onkologicheskiy vestnik. 2017; 3: 60–63. (In Russian)
49. Letyagin A.Yu. Magnetic resonance imaging in lymphatic oncology: TNM-staging of cancer process and the analysis of the theory of “sentinel” lymph node. Luchevaya diagnostika i terapiya. 2012; 2: 8–19. (In Russian)
50. Zinov'eva A.L., Kurtasanov R.S., Laryukov A.V. Application of ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of lymph node. Tezisy 3-go S"ezda spetsialistov ul'trazvukovoy diagnostiki Privolzhskogo federal'nogo okruga. Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics. 2014; 3: 116–117. (In Russian)
51. Ternovoy S.K., Nasnikova I.Yu., Morozova S.P., Markina N.Yu., Alekseeva E.S. Radiodiagnostics malignant ovarian tumors. Diagnosticheskaya interventsionnaya radiologiya. 2008. 2 (4): 37–49. (In Russian)
52. Andrew W. Bazemore, Douglas R. Smucker. Lymphadenopathy and Malignancy. Am. Family Physician. 2002; 11 (66): 2103–2110.
53. Will O., Purkayastha S., Chan C., Athanasiou T., Darzi A.W., Gedroyc W., Tekkis P.P. Diagnostic precision of nano particle-enhanced MRI for lymph-node metastases: a meta-analesis. Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7: 52–60.
54. Bellin M.-F., Lebleu L., Meric J.-B. Evaluation of retroperitoneal and pelvic lymph node metastases with MRI and MR lymphangiography. Abdom. Imaging. 2003; 28: 155–163.
55. Khoruzhik S.A. Magnetic resonance imaging in medical practice. Zdravookhranenie. 2016; 8: 40–47. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Diomidova V.N., Еfimova O.A. Modern Radiodiagnostics Technology of Metastasises in Pelvic Lymph Nodes. Medical Visualization. 2017;(6):100-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2017-6-100-108
Views:
1251
Email this article 