The Diagnosis of Breast Cancer after Augmentation Mammoplasty (Case Report)
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2017-1-85-89
Abstract
The number of women resorting to endoprosthesis replacement of breast is growing from year to year. To date, the most popular and safe method of correcting the shape and size of the breast is augmentation mammoplasty with silicone gel prostheses. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of breast cancer in patients who have had recourse to the augmentation mammoplasty at preclinical stages, is difficult. Most often this is due to the fact that the patient does not undergo preventive examinations. This research exemplifies a comprehensive procedure facilitating diagnostication of a breast cancer in a patient previously subjected to augmentation mammoplasty. A physical examination, a digital and an ultrasound mammography reveals a BI-RADS 5 nodal formation in the patient’s right breast. An ultrasound-guided biopsy of the newly formed tissue over the breast implant is morphologically cross-checked. The diagnosis of breast cancer is thus confirmed histologically.
About the Authors
A. Yu. Vasilev
A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
doct. of med. sci., Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor of Department of Radiology of A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State Medical University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow
T. V. Pavlova
Moscow Clinical Research Center Moscow Department of Healthcare
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
cand. of med. sci., Head of Radiology Department №2 of Moscow Clinical Research Center of Moscow Department of Healthcare
8, Verhniy Predtechenskiy per., Moscow, 123242, Russia. Radiology Department №2 of Moscow Clinical Research Center of Moscow Department of Healthcare. Phone: +7-916-483-14-92
L. I. Kasatkina
Moscow Clinical Research Center Moscow Department of Healthcare
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Head of Oncology Department of №2 of Moscow Clinical Research Center of Moscow Department of Healthcare
O. O. Manuylova
Moscow Clinical Research Center Moscow Department of Healthcare
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Radiologist of Radiology Department №2 of Moscow Clinical Research Center of Moscow Department of Healthcare
D. L. Rotin
Moscow Clinical Research Center Moscow Department of Healthcare
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
doct. of med. sci., Head of Pananatomy Department of Moscow Clinical Research Center of Moscow Department of Healthcare
References
1. Шумакова Т.А., Савелло В.Е. Возможности УЗИ в оценке состояния молочных желез и имплантатов после увеличивающей маммопластики силиконовыми гелевыми эндопротезами. Медицинская визуализация. 2012; 4: 23–33.
2. Lavigne E., Holowaty E.J., Pan S.Y., Villeneuve P.J., Johnson K.C., Fergusson D.A., Morrison H., Brisson J. Breast cancer detection and survival among women with cosmetic breast implants: systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies. Br. Med. J. 2013; 346: f2399. http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f2399 Accessed June 25, 2013. [дата обращения 30.04.2016]
3. Шумакова Т.А., Савелло В.Е. Комплексная лучевая диагностика рака молочной железы у женщин после увеличивающей маммопластики силиконовыми гелевыми имплантами. Опухоли репродуктивной женской системы. 2014; 3: 36–46.
4. Тамкович C.Н., Войцицкий В.Е., Лактионов П.П. Современные методы диагностики рака молочной железы. Биомедицинская химия. 2014; 60 (2): 141–160.
5. Fajardo L., Limin Yang L., Park J. Imaging and histopathology findings of breast lesions detected by tomosynthesis. Radiol. Soc. N. Am. Аn. Мeet. Nov. Chicago, 2013. 15 р.
6. Васильев А.Ю., Павлова Т.В., Касаткина Л.И., Мануйлова О.О., Ротин Д.Л. Сложности дифференциальной диагностики непальпируемого узлового образования молочной железы в амбулаторно-поликлинической практике. Радиология-Практика. 2016; 5: 47–52.
Review
For citations:
Vasilev A.Yu., Pavlova T.V., Kasatkina L.I., Manuylova O.O., Rotin D.L. The Diagnosis of Breast Cancer after Augmentation Mammoplasty (Case Report). Medical Visualization. 2017;(1):85-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2017-1-85-89
Views:
1200
Email this article 