Prostate Zonal Anatomy: do we Always Need Central Zone?
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2017-1-69-74
Abstract
This paper contains historical review of prostate gland zonal anatomy approaches from morphological and radiological points of view. Nowadays, someconfusion remains in “central zone” term usage. Thus, authors propose to avoid using this termin conclusions of MR and TRUS exams. It’s also recommended to use 39 sectors prostate scheme for tumor localization only in cases, where MR exams were technically corresponded to PIRADSv2 system requirements.
About the Authors
A. I. Gromov
A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology Research and Practical Center of Moscow Department of Healthcare
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
doct. of med. sci., professor, professor of radiology department of A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; Chief Researcher of Expert Department of Radiology Research and Practical Center of Moscow Department of Healthcare, Moscow
28/1, Srednyaya Kalitnikovskaya str., 107076, Moscow, Russia. Scientific and Practical Center of Medical Radiology. Phone: +7-495-276-04-36
V. V. Kapustin
A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Moscow municipal oncological hospital No.62
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
doct. of med. sci., associate professor of radiology department A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; Head of Ultrasound diagnostics department of Moscow municipal oncological hospital No.62, Moscow
A. V. Prokhorov
Radiology Research and Practical Center of Moscow Department of Healthcare
D.D. Pletnev Municipal clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
cand. of med. sci., leading scientist of Expert Department of Radiology Research and Practical Center of Moscow Department of Healthcare; Head of Ultrasound diagnostics department of D.D. Pletnev Municipal clinical Hospital, Moscow
References
1. Привес М.Г., Лысенков Н.К., Бушкович В.И. Анатомия человека. Л.: Медицина, 1974. 671 с.
2. Lowsley O.S. The gross anatomy of the human prostate gland and contiguous structures. Surg. Ginecol. Obstet. 1915; 20: 183–192.
3. Tissel L.E., Salander H. The lobes of human prostate. Scan. J. Urol. Nephrol. 1975; 9: 185–191.
4. McNeal J.E. The zonal anatomy of the prostate. Prostate. 1981; 2: 35–49.
5. Rifkin M.D., Dähnert, W., Kurtz, A.B. State of the art: endorectal sonography of prostate gland. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1990; 154: 691–700.
6. Громов А.И., Капустин В.В. Ультразвуковое исследование предстательной железы. М.: Шико, 2014: 8–9.
7. Barentsz J.O., Richenberg J., Clements R., Choyke P., Verma S., Villeirs G., Rouviere O., Logager V., Fütterer J.J. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur. Radiol. 2012; 22: 746–757. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y.
8. Мищенко А.В., Рубцова Н.А., Алексеев Б.Я., Петров С.Б., Беляев А.М., Каприн А.Д. Система унифицированного подхода к интерпретации магнитно-резонансной томографии предстательной железы согласно руководству PI-RADSv2. Онкоурология. 2016; 1: 81–89.
9. Weinreb J.C., Barentsz J.O., Choyke P.L. et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur. Urol. 2016; 69 (1): 16–40.
Review
For citations:
Gromov A.I., Kapustin V.V., Prokhorov A.V. Prostate Zonal Anatomy: do we Always Need Central Zone? Medical Visualization. 2017;(1):69-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2017-1-69-74
Views:
2392
Email this article 