Preview

Medical Visualization

Advanced search

Ultrasound Imaging of Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies

Abstract

Objective: to study the capabilities of ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of soft tissue foreign bodies.

Materials and methods. 93 patients with a preliminary diagnosis of foreign bodies soft tissue ultrasound examination performed on the, HDI 5000 and the Aplio 500scanners;transducer elected respectively scan depth of interest in the location area. To improve the ultrasound diagnostics of foreign bodies used the original method of initializing, Twinkling artifact. Identified foreign bodies were extracted intraoperatively – in 11 (11.8%) patients, either through the wound channel – in 75 (80.6%). Diagnosis of foreign body was expelled in 7 (7.5%) patients (own bone sequesters (4) and parasitic invasion (dirofilariasis) (3)).

Results. Ultrasound reveals foreign bodies, including not determined radiographically, to differentiate them from other disease states with similar clinical picture. Echographic characteristics in conjunction with the study history presumably prevented to judge the foreign body material (wood, glass, bone, gauze, latex etc.).Optimization of diagnosis of foreign bodies contributed to the use of the original method of initiation, Twinkling artifact. Ultrasound also allows to evaluate the localization of foreign bodies and their relative positions to the surrounding anatomical and pathological structures, identify the signs of inflammation, abscess formation.

Conclusion. Studies have shown high information ultrasonography in the diagnosis of foreign bodies, including not determined radiographically. The data can be the basis for the differentiated choice of medical tactics, in particular, the establishment of indications for surgical or minimally invasive treatment.

About the Authors

A. D. Zubov
M. Gorky Donetsk National Medical University
Russian Federation

doct. of med. sci., the Professor of the Oncology Department of the M. Gorky Donetsk National Medical University, Donetsk

83099, Donetsk, Ilicha Ave, 14, Bldg. 14, Donetsk Clinical Territorial Medical Association. Phone: + 38-050-935-37-71



O. V. Senchenko
M. Gorky Donetsk National Medical University
Russian Federation

the senior laboratory assistant of the Oncology Department of the MюGorky Donetsk National Medical University, Donetsk



Yu. V. Chernyaeva
M. Gorky Donetsk National Medical University
Russian Federation

cand. of med. sci., the Associate Professor of the Oncology Department of the M. Gorky Donetsk National Medical University, Donetsk



References

1. Mittendorff R.E. Foreign Body Removal. Wound. Ann. Surg. 2004; 242 (6): 782–788.

2. Гаврилин А.В., Степанова Ю.А., Жуков А.О., Федотов С.В. Ультразвуковая диагностика изменений мягких тканей в области послеоперационной раны. Диагностическая и интервенционная радиология. 2007; 1 (1): 36–45.

3. Зубов А.Д., Губанов Д.М. Ультразвуковая визуализация инородных тел мягких тканей. В сб.: Актуальні проблеми ультразвукової діагностики. Київ: ВБО “Український допплерівський клуб”, 2013: 87–88.

4. Рязанцев А.А., Гончарова Т.П. Диагностика ятрогенных инородных тел в раннем и позднем послеоперационном периоде. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2013; 1: 15–26.

5. Kourelis K., Mourtzouchos K., Haronis V. et al. Ultrasoundguided removal of impalpable, radiolucent vegetative foreign bodies embedded into facial soft tissues of a toddler.Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 91: 64–66.

6. Кузнецов Н.А., ЗиняковаМ.В., Харитонов С.В. и др. Ультразвуковая диагностика инородных тел брюшной полости. Хирургия. 2001; 10: 21–23.

7. Андреев А.В., Приходько А.Г., Сахно В.Д. и др. Ультразвуковая диагностика текстильных инородных тел брюшной полости. Медицинская визуализация. 2009; 2: 68–72.

8. Харнесс Дж.К., Вишер Д.Б. Ультразвуковая диагностика в хирургии: основные сведения и клиническое применение. М.: БИНОМ. Лаборатория знаний, 2010. 597 с.

9. Yang J.H., Kang G., Choi M.J. The role of the acoustic radiation force in color Doppler twinkling artifacts. Ultrasonography. 2015; 34 (2): 109–114.

10. Lu W., Sapozhnikov O.A., Bailey M.R. et al. Evidence for trapped surface bubbles as the cause for the twinkling artifact in ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2013; 39 (6): 1026–1038.

11. Ozan E., Atac G.K., Gundogdu S. Twinkling artifact on color Doppler ultrasound: an advantage or a pitfall? J. Med. Ultrason. 2016; 43 (3): 361–371.

12. Yavuz A., Ceken K., Alimoglu E., Kabaalioglu A. The reliability of color doppler “twinkling” artifact for diagnosing millimetrical nephrolithiasis: comparison with B-Mode US and CT scanning results. J. Med. Ultrason. 2015; 42 (2): 215–222.

13. Wilson J.I., Zubov A.D. Role of Doppler Navigation in Minimally Invasive Procedures under Ultrasound Guidance. Br. J. Med. & Med. Res. 2016; 13 (2): 1–9.


Review

For citations:


Zubov A.D., Senchenko O.V., Chernyaeva Yu.V. Ultrasound Imaging of Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies. Medical Visualization. 2016;(6):125-132. (In Russ.)

Views: 6477


ISSN 1607-0763 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9516 (Online)