Breast Calcifications: Etiology, Classification, Prognosis
Abstract
Objective. To analyze of numerous works devoted to the evaluation of microcalcifications, their classification into benign and malignant, as well as the prognosis of malignant diseases in the presence of calcifications in them.
Materials and methods. Was analyzed works devoted to the evaluation of microcalcifications, as well as was evaluated 1195 mammograms, which was performed on the AMULET digital mammography system by FUJIFILM in our center in January–February of 2015. These data was compared.
Results. Breast microcalcifications are widespread criteria both benign and malignant lesions of the breast. It occurs in about 40% of breast cancers, and a half of them are not palpable. Besides, breast cancer with microcalcifications have worse prognosis.
Conclusion. Microcalcifications are one of the most important marker of breast cancer. It needs to be studied more carefully.
About the Authors
E. A. OksanchukRussian Federation
junior researcher of laboratory of X-ray radiology, ultrasound and X-ray surgical techniques in mammalogy (the Federal Breast Center) research department of early carcinogenesis, prevention, diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of cancers of the female reproductive organs,
141011 Moscow region, Kolpakova str., 34b-25
E. V. Meskih
Russian Federation
doct. of med. sci., professor, head of laboratory of X-ray radiology, ultrasound and X-ray surgical techniques in mammalogy (the Federal Breast Center) research department of early carcinogenesis, prevention, diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of cancers of the female reproductive organs,
Moscow
A. U. Kolesnik
Russian Federation
cand. of med. sci., researcher of laboratory of X-ray radiology, ultrasound and X-ray surgical techniques in mammalogy (the Federal Breast Center) research department of early carcinogenesis, prevention, diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of cancers of the female reproductive organs,
Moscow
N. V. Nudnov
Russian Federation
dokt. of med. sci., professor, Deputy Director for Scientific Research,
Moscow
References
1. Yunus M., Ahmed N., Masroor I. et al. Mammographic criteria for determining the diagnostic value of microcalcifications in the detection of early breast cancer. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2004; 54: 24–29.
2. Morgan M.P., Cooke M.M., McCarthy G.M. Microcalcifications associated with breast cancer: an epiphenome non or biologically significant feature of selected tumors? J. of mammary gland biology and neoplasia. 2005; 10 (2): 181–187.
3. Ayvaci M., Alagoz O., Chhatwal J. et al. Predicting invasive breast cancer versus DCIS in different age groups. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 584–594.
4. Gajdos C., Tartter P.I., Bleiweiss I. J. et al. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics. Ann. Surg. 2002; 235 (2): 246–251.
5. Naseem M., Murray J., Hilton J.F. et al. Mammographic microcalcifications and breast cancer tumorigenesis: a radiologic-pathologic analysis. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15: 2–9.
6. Evans A., Pinder S., Ellis I. et al. Breast Calcification. By MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall, 2002. 172 p.
7. Корженкова Г.П., Долгушин Б.И. Опыт использования цифровой маммографии. Радиология–практика. 2009; 6: 42–48. Korzhenkova G., Dolgushin B. Experience of digital mammography using. Radiologia-praktica. 2009; 6: 42–48. (In Russian)
8. Sickles E.A. Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. Radiology. 1986; 160: 289–293.
9. Fiaschetti V., Pistolese Ch.A., Perretta T. et al. BI-RADs microcalcifications: correlation between MRI and histological findings. ISRN Oncology. 2011; 10; 1–7.
10. Кабин Ю.В., Громов А.И., Капустин В.В.. Применение ультразвуковой технологии улучшения визуализации микрокальцинатов (MicroPure) в диагностике рака молочной железы. Радиология–практика. 2011; 6: 47–53. Kabin Yu.V., Gromov A.I., Kapustin V.V. Application of ultrasound technology of calcifications visualization improvement (MicroPure) for breast cancer diagnostics. Radiologia-praktica. 2011; 6: 47–53. (In Russian)
11. Lee Spangler M., Zuley M.L., Sumkin J.H. et al. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011; 196: 320–324.
12. Рожкова Н.И., Бурдина И.И., Запирова С.Б. и др. Контрастная двуэнергетическая спектральная маммография (обзор). Исследования и практика в медицине. 2015; 2 (4): 82–87. Rozhkova N.I., Burdina I.I., Zapirova S.B. et al. Contrast enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) (review). Research'n Practical Medicine Journal. 2015; 2 (4): 82–87. (In Russian)
13. Scimeca M., Giannini E., Antonacci C. et al. Microcalcifications in breast cancer: an active phenomenon mediated by epithelial cells with mesenchymal characteristics. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 286–296.
14. Daniaux M., De Zordo T., Santner W. et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015; 292: 739–747.
15. Tse G.M., Tan P.H., Cheung H.S. et al. Intermediate to highly suspicious calcification in breast lesions: a radiopathologic correlation. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2008; 110: 1–7.
16. Sornrner G., Kopsa H., Zazgornik J. et al. Breast calcifications in renal hyperparathyroidis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1987; 148: 855–857.
17. Baldi C., Vazquez G., Boland R. Capacitative calcium influx in human epithelial breast cancer and nontumorigenic cells occurs through Ca2+ entry pathways with different permeabilities to divalent cations. J. Cell. Biochem. 2003; 88: 1265–1272.
18. Zhang L., Liu Y., Song F. et al. Functional SNP in the microRNA-367 binding site in the 3 UTR of the calcium channel ryanodine receptor gene 3(RYR3) affects breast cancer risk and calcification. PNAS. 2011; 108 (33): 13653–13658.
19. Uematsu T., Kasami M., Yuen S. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications. Breast Cancer. 2008; 15 (4): 291–297.
20. Demetri-Lewis A., Slanetz P.J., Eisenberg R.L. Breast calcifications: the focal group. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2012; 198: 325–343.
21. Baker R., Rogers K.D., Shepherd N. et al. New relationships between breast microcalcifications and cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2010; 103 (7): 1034–1039.
22. Scimeca M., Antonacci C., Bonanno E. et al. Breast microcalcifications: a focus. J. Cell. Sci. Ther. 2015; S8; 2–9.
23. Berg W.A., Arnoldus C.L., Teferra E. et al. Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology. 2001; 221: 495–503.
24. Muhimmah I., Oliver A., Denton E.R.E. et al. Comparison between Wolfe, Boyd, BI-RADS and Tabar Based Mammographic Risk Assessment. IWDM. 2006; 4046: 407–415.
25. Burnside E.S, Ochsner J.E., Fowler K.J, Fine J.P. et al. Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology. 2007; 242: 388–395.
26. Balleyguier C., Ayadi S., Nguyen K.V. et al. BIRADS classification in mammography. Eur. J. Radiol. 2007; 61: 192–194.
27. D’Orsi C.J., Sickles E.A., Mendelson E.B. et al. ACR BIRADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. By Reston V.A. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2013; 125–143.
Review
For citations:
Oksanchuk E.A., Meskih E.V., Kolesnik A.U., Nudnov N.V. Breast Calcifications: Etiology, Classification, Prognosis. Medical Visualization. 2016;(5):120-127. (In Russ.)