CT and MRI features of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1510
Abstract
The aim of the study was to study the characteristic CT and MRI features of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors.
Material and methods. CT and MRI images of 13 patients with phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors were analyzed. The size, localization, shape, contours, structure of the tumor, accumulation of contrast agent, a position relative to the cortical layer, and size of the lymph nodes were assessed.
Results. Eight bone tumors (average size 23 ± 9.6 mm) and 5 soft tissue tumors (36.2 ± 47.5 mm) were detected.
In patients with soft tissue tumors, the oval shape was predominant. The contours of all tumors were smooth, the tumors were adjacent to the cortical bone layer according to CT data in 75% of cases. According to MRI data, in all cases the tumors were adjacent to the cortical bone layer. In half of cases, calcifications were determined in the tumor structure. The structure of the tumor according to CT data was homogeneous, while in half of the cases, septa were visualized on MRI images. Soft tissue tumors intensively enhanced on CT and MRI. In patients with bone tumor, rounded shapes predominated. In one case, a large sacral tumor (measuring about 40 mm) prolapsed into the spinal canal. The tumors were predominantly osteolytic with sclerotic contours and were located subcortically. Osteoid or chondroid matrix in the form of calcifications was determined in the structure. According to CT data, in 3 cases the tumors intensively enhanced, in 3 cases they did not enhance, and in 1 observation there was a weak enhancement. In MRI, all lesions intensively enhanced.
Conclusion. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor can occur in bones and soft tissues. CT and MRI allow to identify them and determine the boundaries of surgical resection, but should be used as second-line diagnostic methods after radioisotope methods. The use of a new diagnostic feature: the adjacency of bone and soft tissue formations to the cortical layer, and focusing attention by radiologists on this area may reduce the risk of “missing” the tumor.
About the Authors
S. A. BuryakinaRussian Federation
Svetlana A. Buryakina – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), radiologist of the department of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Endocrinology Research Centre, Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9065-7791
E-mail: sburyakina@yandex.ru
S. A. Gronskaia
Russian Federation
Sofia A. Gronskaia – graduate student of the Department of osteoporosis and osteopathy; Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Molecular Oncoendocrinology of Endocrinology Research Centre, Moscow.
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7055-2407
N. V. Tarbaeva
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Tarbaeva – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the department of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Endocrinology Research Centre, Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7965-9454
E-mail: Ntarbaeva@inbox.ru
Zh. E. Belaya
Russian Federation
Zhanna E. Belaya – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of osteoporosis and osteopathy of Endocrinology Research Centre, Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-6441
E-mail: jannabelaya@gmail.com
N. G. Mokrysheva
Russian Federation
Natalia G. Mokrysheva – Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, director of Endocrinology Research Centre, Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9717-9742
E-mail: nmic.endo@endocrincentr.ru
References
1. Uramoto N., Furukawa M., Yoshizaki T. Malignant phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor, mixed connective tissue variant of the tongue. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009; 36: 104–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2008.01.003
2. Ogose A., Hotta T., Emura I. et al. Recurrent malignant variant of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor with oncogenic osteomalacia. Skelet. Radiol. 2001; 30: 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560000306
3. Gronskaya S.A., Golounina O.O., Buklemishev Y.V. et al. A clinical case of phosphopenic osteomalacia due to paraneoplastic secretion of metastatic prostate cance. Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases. 2022; 25 (4): 43–51. https://doi.org/10.14341/osteo12948 (In Russian)
4. Folpe A.L., Fanburg-Smith J.C., Billings S.D. et al. Most osteomalacia-associated mesenchymal tumors are a single histopathologic entity: an analysis of 32 cases and a comprehensive review of the literature. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2004; 28 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200401000-00001
5. Gronskaia S.A., Belaya Z.E., Melnichenko G.A. FGF23 tumor induced osteomalacia. Problemy Endokrinologii. 2022; 68 (5): 56–66. https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13130 (In Russian)
6. Bulycheva I.V., Rodionova S.S., Karpenko V.Y. et al. Oncogenic osteomalacia/phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor: clinical case and literature review. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas, tumors of the skin. 2022; 14 (1): 48–54. https://doi.org/10.17650/2782-3687-2022-14-1-48-54 (In Russian)
7. Eremkina A.K., Mirnaya S.S., Gorbacheva A.M. et al. The case of oncogenic hypophosphatemic osteomalacia. Obesity and Metabolism. 2020; 17 (2): 220–227. https://doi.org/10.14341/omet12472
8. Gronskaia S.A., Belaya Z.E., Rozhinskaya L.Y. et al. Clinical features, diagnostics and treatment of FGF23 secreting tumors: series of 40 clinical cases. Problems of Endocrinology. 2023; 69 (5): 25–38. https://doi.org/10.14341/probl13221
9. Leaf D.E., Pereira R.C., Bazari H., Juppner H. Oncogenic osteomalacia due to FGF23-expressing colon adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013; 98 (3): 887–891. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3473
10. Lin H.A., Shih S.R., Tseng Y.T. et al. Ovarian cancer-related hypophosphatemic osteomalacia-a case report. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014; 99 (12): 4403–4407. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2120
11. Xie Y., Li H.Z. Oncogenic osteomalacia caused by renal cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013. 98 (12): 4597–4598. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-3335
12. Chong W.H., Andreopoulou P., Chen C.C. et al. Tumor localization and biochemical response to cure in tumor-induced osteomalacia. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013; 28 (6): 1386–1398. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1881
13. Minisola S., Fukumoto S., Xia W. et al. Tumor-induced osteomalacia: a comprehensive review. Endocrine Rev. 2023; 44 (2): 323–353. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnac026
14. Grebennikova T.A., Umiarova D.Sh., Slashchuk K.Y. et al. Tumor-induced osteomalacia: a сlinical case report. Osteoporosis and bone diseases. 2018; 21 (4): 24–28. https://doi.org/10.14341/osteo10264
15. Broski S.M., Folpe A.L., Wenger D.E. Imaging features of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. Skeletal. Radiol. 2019; 48 (1): 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-3014-5
16. Liu Y., He H., Zhang C. et al. Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumors: Rethinking the Clinical Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment. J. Clin. Med. 2022; 12 (1): 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12010252
17. Folpe A.L. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors: A review and update. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2019; 36 (4): 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semdp.2019.07.002
18. Richardson A.L., Richardson O.K. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor: case report. Radiol. Case Rep. 2019; 14 (12): 1518–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2019.09.027
19. Ho C.L. Ga68-DOTA peptide PET/CT to detect occult mesenchymal tumor-inducing osteomalacia: a case series of three patients. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2015; 49 (3): 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-015-0328-2
20. Kumar R., Folpe A.L., Mullan B.P. Tumor-induced osteomalacia. Transl. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015; 7(3): 1–24.
21. Benson J.C., Trejo-Lopez J.A., Nassiri A.M. et al. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2022; 43 (6): 817–822. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7513
22. Broski S.M., Folpe A.L., Wenger D.E. Imaging features of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. Skeletal. Radiol. 2019; 48 (1): 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-3014-5
23. Nakanishi K., Sakai M., Tanaka H. et al. Whole-body MR imaging in detecting phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (PMT) in tumor-induced hypophosphatemic osteomalacia. Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 2013; 12 (1): 47–52.
24. Shi Z., Deng Y., Li X. et al. CT and MR imaging features in phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor-mixed connective tissue: a case report. Oncol. Lett. 2018; 15 (4): 4970–4978. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.7945
25. Jan de Beur S.M., Minisola S., Xia W.B. et al. Global guidance for the recognition, diagnosis, and management of tumor‐induced osteomalacia. J. Internal Med. 2023; 293 (3): 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13593
26. El-Maouche D., Sadowski S.M., Papadakis G.Z. et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE for tumor localization in tumor-induced osteomalacia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016; 101 (10): 3575–3581. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2052
27.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Buryakina S.A., Gronskaia S.A., Tarbaeva N.V., Belaya Zh.E., Mokrysheva N.G. CT and MRI features of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor. Medical Visualization. 2025;29(2):60-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1510