Preview

Medical Visualization

Advanced search

The ability to determine the percentage of kidney contribution to excretory function. Preliminary results

https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1507

Abstract

Purpose. Determination of the possibility of using kidney segmentation to obtain data on their volume and density characteristics to assess the split renal function.

Material and methods. The data of 31 patients who underwent nephroscintigraphy and CT examination of the kidneys with contrast were analyzed. Segmentation of both kidneys into the nephrographic phase of contrast was performed at the workstation using the Vitrea Advanced Visualization program. The obtained values of the volume were multiplied at the attenuation coefficient of X-ray radiation in Hounsfield units (HU) for each kidney to obtain the "mass" of the contrast preparation. Having divided the obtained value of each kidney by their sum value and multiplying by 100%, we obtained a split contribution of each kidney to their total excretory function in percentages. To verify the need to introduce parenchymal density into calculations in the native phase of the study, the density of the parenchyma of both kidneys was measured at three levels in the native phase, then, the calculated arithmetic mean was subtracted from the average density of the renal parenchyma in the nephrographic phase. Subsequently, the same calculations were performed to obtain the percentage contribution of the kidneys as before deducting the native density. Nephroscintigraphy was performed in various medical institutions. Studies were conducted with technetium compounds (99mTc). For further analysis, data on the percentage contribution of each kidney to their overall excretory function were taken.

Results. The obtained data on the percentage contribution of the kidneys to their total excretory function obtained by nephroscintigraphy were compared with the calculated CT data. The analysis showed a very high correlation and covariance of these results (the correlation coefficient is 0.99 (p < 0.001), the covariance coefficient is 0.95 (p < 0.001)). When conducting a correlation analysis of the results of nephroscintigraphy with CT data, where an additional correction was made for the native density of parenchyma (it was subtracted from the average density of parenchyma in the nephrographic phase), the results remained the same: the correlation coefficient was 0.99 (p < 0.001); the covariance coefficient was 0.95 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions. An accessible and practical method for evaluating split renal function has been developed. The method does not require the implementation of a clearly regulated time protocol for multiphase CT. CT data performed in any medical institution can be evaluated. The method does not require additional assessment of the native densitometric characteristics of the kidneys. The results obtained using the method showed a very high correlation with the data of dynamic nephroscintigraphy.

About the Authors

A. I. Gromov
N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Alexander I. Gromov – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the radiation diagnosis and treatment methods, Oncourology Department, N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Professor of Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9014-9022



Ya. S. Domorovskaya
N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Yana S. Domorovskaya – radiologist at the N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7686-1718 



A. V. Sivkov
N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Andrey V. Sivkov – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Deputy Director for Science of the N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8852-6485 



M. Yu. Prosyannikov
N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Mikhail Yu. Prosyannikov – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Urolithiasis at the N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-5244



D. A. Voitko
N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Voitko – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Researcher at the Department of Urolithiasis of the N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-1651



A. D. Kaprin
National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation

Andrey D. Kaprin – Full Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Director of National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Head of Department of urology and surgical nephrology with a course of oncourology at the medical faculty of medical institute of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba, Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8784-8415



B. Ya. Alekseev
National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Russian Biotechnological University
Russian Federation

Boris Ya. Alekseev – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Deputy Director General for Scientific Work of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3398-4128



O. I. Apolikhin
N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Oleg I. Apolikhin – Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Director of the N.A. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiologiсal Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-043X



References

1. Levey A.S., Stevens L.A., Schmid C.H. et al.; CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009; 150 (9): 604–612. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155 (6): 408. PMID: 19414839; PMCID: PMC2763564

2. National recommendations. Chronic kidney disease: basic principles of screening, diagnosis, prevention and treatment approaches. S-Pb: Levsha. 2012. 51 p. (In Russian)

3. Clinical recommendations. Chronic kidney disease (CKD). Nephrology. 2021; 25 (5): 10–82. https://doi.org/10.36485/1561-6274-2021-25-5-10-82 (In Russian)

4. Dawson P., Peters M. Dynamic contrast bolus computed tomography for the assessment of renal function. Invest. Radiol. 1993; 28 (11): 1039–1042. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199311000-00014

5. Tsushima Y., Blomley M.J., Okabe K. et al. Determination of glomerular filtration rate per unit renal volume using computerized tomography: correlation with conventional measures of total and divided renal function. J. Urology. 2001; 165: 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200102000-00007

6. Diez A., Powelson J., Sundaram C.P. et al. Correlation between CT-based measured renal volumes and nuclear-renography-based split renal function in living kidney donors. Clinical diagnostic utility and practice patterns. Clin. Transplant. 2014; 28 (6): 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12365

7. Wahba R., Franke M., Hellmich M. et al. Computed Tomography Volumetry in Preoperative Living Kidney Donor Assessment for Prediction of Split Renal Function. Transplantation. 2016; 100 (6): 1270–1277. https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000000889

8. Alyaev Yu.G., Dzeranov N.K., Khokhlachev S.B. et al. A new method for evaluating separate kidney function based on multispiral computed tomography with contrast. Urology. 2018; 2: 26–33. https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2018.2.26-33 (In Russian)

9. Alyaev Yu.G., Khokhlachev S.B., Fiev D.N. et al. A new approach for split renal function evaluation of glomerular filtration rate, perfusion and plasma flow by numerical analysis of 3D MSCT-based models. REJR. 2018; 8 (2): 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1569-9056(18)31068-6

10. Fiev D.N., Khokhlachev S.B., Borisov V.V. et al. The results of the analysis of the structural and functional state of the kidneys by the method mathematical processing of MSCT data with contrast in patients with urolithiasis. Urology. 2019; 5: 72–78. https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2019.5.72-78

11. Shi W., Liang X., Wu N. et al. Assessment of Split Renal Function Using a Combination of Contrast-Enhanced CT and Serum Creatinine Values for Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2020; 215 (1): 142–147. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.19.22125

12. Fowler J.C., Beadsmoore C., Gaskarth M.T. et al. A simple processing method allowing comparison of renal enhancing volumes derived from standard portal venous phase contrast-enhanced multidetector CT images to derive a CT estimate of differential renal function with equivalent results to nuclear medicine quantification. Br. J. Radiol. 2006; 79 (948): 935–942. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/53140218

13. Summerlin A.L., Lockhart M.E., Strang A.M. et al. Determination of split renal function by 3D reconstruction of CT angiograms: a comparison with gamma camera renography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008; 191 (5): 1552–1558. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.07.4023

14. Kaprin A.D., Alekseev B.Ya., Apolikhin O.I. et al. Method for determining the percentage of kidney contribution to excretory function. Inventions and utility models. The official bulletin of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property (ROSPATENT). №28-2023. Patent for invention No. 2804579 (In Russian)


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Gromov A.I., Domorovskaya Ya.S., Sivkov A.V., Prosyannikov M.Yu., Voitko D.A., Kaprin A.D., Alekseev B.Ya., Apolikhin O.I. The ability to determine the percentage of kidney contribution to excretory function. Preliminary results. Medical Visualization. 2025;29(1):71-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1507

Views: 200


ISSN 1607-0763 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9516 (Online)