Preview

Medical Visualization

Advanced search

Echographic pattern features of dissections of the extracranial parts of the brachiocephalic arteries

https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1392

Abstract

Purpose: to determine the frequency of various ultrasound signs of dissections of the extracranial parts of the brachiocephalic arteries, as well as to compare the results of ultrasound and neuroimaging methods in the diagnostics of dissections.

Materials and methods. The study included data on 108 patients, among them 44 (40.7%) women, 64 (59.3%) men, mean age was 56 ± 14 years. All patients underwent duplex scanning of the brachiocephalic arteries, 53 patients underwent CT-angiography, and 99 patients underwent MRI.

Results. The sensitivity of duplex scanning in the primary diagnosis of dissections in our study was 97.2%. In 40 patients (37%) with dissections according to duplex scanning the presence of dissection was also confirmed on CT-angiography or MRI. Expansion of the vessel diameter and the presence of intramural hematoma (IMH), as well as their combination, were the most common ultrasound signs of dissections in our study. In cases where dissection was not confirmed by CT-angiography or MRI data moderate echogenicity of IMH was noted significantly more often (p = 0.018). Of all the ultrasound signs of dissections, the highest share of coincidence with the signs obtained with neuroimaging diagnostic methods occurred with IMG.

Conclusion. The most frequently recorded ultrasound signs of dissections were the expansion of the vessel diameter and the presence of IMG, as well as their combination. The results of the study showed a high sensitivity of the ultrasound method in detecting dissections, especially in the subacute and chronic stages, as well as to determine the causes of ischemic stroke in the differential diagnosis of brachiocephalic artery pathologies.

About the Authors

Ekaterina V. Orlova
ФГБУ “Федеральный центр мозга и нейротехнологий” ФМБА России
Russian Federation

Ekaterina V. Orlova – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Experimental and Clinical Physiology of Circulation, Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies” of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow



Alexander B. Berdalin
ФГБУ “Федеральный центр мозга и нейротехнологий” ФМБА России

Alexander B. Berdalin – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow



Darya M. Khaitsman
ФГБУ “Федеральный центр мозга и нейротехнологий” ФМБА России
Russian Federation

Darya M. Khaitsman – Researcher, Department of Experimental and Clinical Physiology of Circulation, Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies” of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow



Vladimir G. Lelyuk
ФГБУ “Федеральный центр мозга и нейротехнологий” ФМБА России
Russian Federation

Vladimir G. Lelyuk – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of Department clinical and experimental physiology of circulatory system, ultrasound and functional diagnostics, Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies” of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow



Svetlana E. Lelyuk
ФГБОУ ДПО “Российская медицинская академия непрерывного профессионального образования” Минздрава России
Russian Federation

Svetlana E. Lelyuk – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional, Moscow



References

1. Pham M.H., Rahme R.J., Arnaout O. et al. Endovascular Stenting of Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissections: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68 (4): 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0b013e318209ce03

2. Völker W., Besselmann M., Dittrich R. et al. Generalized arteriopathy in patients with cervical artery dissection. Neurology. 2005; 64 (9): 1508–1513. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000159739.24607.98

3. Gardner D.J., Gosink B.B., Kallman C.E. Internal carotid artery dissections: duplex ultrasound imaging. J. Ultrasound Med. 1991; 10 (11): 607–614. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1991.10.11.607

4. Nebelsieck J., Sengelhoff C., Nassenstein I. et al. Sensitivity of neurovascular ultrasound for the detection of spontaneous cervical artery dissection. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2009; 16 (1): 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2008.04.005

5. Yang L., Ran H. Extracranial vertebral artery dissection. Medicine. 2018; 97 (9): e0067. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000010067

6. Kalashnikova L.A., Dobry`nina L.A., Chechetkin A.O., Dreval` M.V. Disorders of cerebral circulation during dissection of the internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Diagnostic algorithm. (Narusheniya mozgovogo krovoobrashheniya pri dissekcii vnutrennej sonnoj i pozvonochnoj arterij. Algoritm diagnostiki). Nervny`e bolezni = Neurological diseases. 2016. 2: 10–15. (In Russian)

7. Benninger D.H., Baumgartner R.W. Ultrasound Diagnosis of Cervical Artery Dissection. In: Handbook on Neurovascular Ultrasound. KARGER; 2006: 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000092386

8. Ben Hassen W., Machet A., Edjlali-Goujon M. et al. Imaging of cervical artery dissection. Diagn. Interv. Imaging. 2014; 95 (12): 1151–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2014.10.003

9. Petro G., Witwer G., Cacayorin E. et al. Spontaneous dissection of the cervical internal carotid artery: correlation of arteriography, CT, and pathology. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1987; 148 (2): 393–398. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.148.2.393

10. Zuber M., Meary E., Meder J.F., Mas J.L. Magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic CT scan in cervical artery dissections. Stroke. 1994; 25 (3): 576–581. dhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.25.3.576

11. Leclerc X., Godefroy O., Salhi A. et al. Helical CT for the Diagnosis of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Dissection. Stroke. 1996; 27 (3): 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.3.461

12. Rodallec M.H., Marteau V., Gerber S. et al. Craniocervical Arterial Dissection: Spectrum of Imaging Findings and Differential Diagnosis. RadioGraphics. 2008; 28 (6): 1711–1728. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.286085512

13. Benninger D.H., Georgiadis D., Gandjour J., Baumgartner R.W. Accuracy of Color Duplex Ultrasound Diagnosis of Spontaneous Carotid Dissection Causing Ischemia. Stroke. 2006; 37 (2): 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000198811.65068.16

14. Kalashnikova L.A., Dobrynina L.A., Maksimova M.Yu., Tanashyan M.M., Danilova M.S. Dissection of the internal carotid and vertebral artery: management tactics (Dissekciya vnutrennej sonnoj i pozvonochnoj arterij: taktika vedeniya pacientov). Annaly` klinicheskoj i e`ksperimental`noj nevrologii = Annals of clinical and experimental neurology. 2021; 15 (1): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.25692/ACEN.2021.1.1 (In Russian)

15. Clark M., Unnam S., Ghosh S. A review of carotid and vertebral artery dissection. Br. J. Hosp. Med. 2022; 83 (4): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2021.0421

16. Kirsch E., Kaim A., Engelter S. et al. MR angiography in internal carotid artery dissection: Improvement of diagnosis by selective demonstration of the intramural haematoma. Neuroradiology. 1998; 40 (11): 704–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340050668

17. Latchaw R.E., Albers S.L. Imaging the Cervical Vasculature. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017; 59 (6): 555–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2017.05.007

18. Shakir H.J., Davies J.M., Shallwani H. Carotid and Vertebral Dissection Imaging. Curr. Pain. Headache Rep. Published online 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-016-0593-5

19. Debette S., Compter A., Labeyrie M.A. et al. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of intracranial artery dissection. Lancet Neurol. 2015; 14 (6): 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00009-5

20. Brott T.G., Halperin J.L., Abbara S. et al. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/ SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Executive Summary. Vascular Medicine. 2011; 16 (1): 35–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863x11399328

21. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013; 33 (9): 629–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102413485658

22. Provenzale J.M., Sarikaya B. Comparison of Test Performance Characteristics of MRI, MR Angiography, and CT Angiography in the Diagnosis of Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissection: A Review of the Medical Literature. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009; 193 (4): 1167–1174. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.08.1688

23. Elijovich L., Kazmi K., Gauvrit J.Y., Law M. The emerging role of multidetector row CT angiography in the diagnosis of cervical arterial dissection: preliminary study. Neuroradiology. 2006; 48 (9): 606–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-006-0100-5

24. Vertinsky A.T., Schwartz N.E., Fischbein N.J. et al. Comparison of Multidetector CT Angiography and MR Imaging of Cervical Artery Dissection. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008; 29 (9): 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a1189

25. Lyrer P., Engelter S. Antithrombotic Drugs for Carotid Artery Dissection. Stroke. 2004; 35 (2): 613–614. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000112970.63735.fc

26.

27.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Orlova E.V., Berdalin A.B., Khaitsman D.M., Lelyuk V.G., Lelyuk S.E. Echographic pattern features of dissections of the extracranial parts of the brachiocephalic arteries. Medical Visualization. 2024;28(3):77-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1392

Views: 271


ISSN 1607-0763 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9516 (Online)