Echographic pattern features of dissections of the extracranial parts of the brachiocephalic arteries
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1392
Abstract
Purpose: to determine the frequency of various ultrasound signs of dissections of the extracranial parts of the brachiocephalic arteries, as well as to compare the results of ultrasound and neuroimaging methods in the diagnostics of dissections.
Materials and methods. The study included data on 108 patients, among them 44 (40.7%) women, 64 (59.3%) men, mean age was 56 ± 14 years. All patients underwent duplex scanning of the brachiocephalic arteries, 53 patients underwent CT-angiography, and 99 patients underwent MRI.
Results. The sensitivity of duplex scanning in the primary diagnosis of dissections in our study was 97.2%. In 40 patients (37%) with dissections according to duplex scanning the presence of dissection was also confirmed on CT-angiography or MRI. Expansion of the vessel diameter and the presence of intramural hematoma (IMH), as well as their combination, were the most common ultrasound signs of dissections in our study. In cases where dissection was not confirmed by CT-angiography or MRI data moderate echogenicity of IMH was noted significantly more often (p = 0.018). Of all the ultrasound signs of dissections, the highest share of coincidence with the signs obtained with neuroimaging diagnostic methods occurred with IMG.
Conclusion. The most frequently recorded ultrasound signs of dissections were the expansion of the vessel diameter and the presence of IMG, as well as their combination. The results of the study showed a high sensitivity of the ultrasound method in detecting dissections, especially in the subacute and chronic stages, as well as to determine the causes of ischemic stroke in the differential diagnosis of brachiocephalic artery pathologies.
Keywords
About the Authors
Ekaterina V. OrlovaRussian Federation
Ekaterina V. Orlova – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Experimental and Clinical Physiology of Circulation, Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies” of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow
Alexander B. Berdalin
Alexander B. Berdalin – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow
Darya M. Khaitsman
Russian Federation
Darya M. Khaitsman – Researcher, Department of Experimental and Clinical Physiology of Circulation, Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies” of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow
Vladimir G. Lelyuk
Russian Federation
Vladimir G. Lelyuk – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of Department clinical and experimental physiology of circulatory system, ultrasound and functional diagnostics, Federal center of brain research and neurotechnologies” of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow
Svetlana E. Lelyuk
Russian Federation
Svetlana E. Lelyuk – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional, Moscow
References
1. Pham M.H., Rahme R.J., Arnaout O. et al. Endovascular Stenting of Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissections: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68 (4): 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0b013e318209ce03
2. Völker W., Besselmann M., Dittrich R. et al. Generalized arteriopathy in patients with cervical artery dissection. Neurology. 2005; 64 (9): 1508–1513. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000159739.24607.98
3. Gardner D.J., Gosink B.B., Kallman C.E. Internal carotid artery dissections: duplex ultrasound imaging. J. Ultrasound Med. 1991; 10 (11): 607–614. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1991.10.11.607
4. Nebelsieck J., Sengelhoff C., Nassenstein I. et al. Sensitivity of neurovascular ultrasound for the detection of spontaneous cervical artery dissection. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2009; 16 (1): 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2008.04.005
5. Yang L., Ran H. Extracranial vertebral artery dissection. Medicine. 2018; 97 (9): e0067. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000010067
6. Kalashnikova L.A., Dobry`nina L.A., Chechetkin A.O., Dreval` M.V. Disorders of cerebral circulation during dissection of the internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Diagnostic algorithm. (Narusheniya mozgovogo krovoobrashheniya pri dissekcii vnutrennej sonnoj i pozvonochnoj arterij. Algoritm diagnostiki). Nervny`e bolezni = Neurological diseases. 2016. 2: 10–15. (In Russian)
7. Benninger D.H., Baumgartner R.W. Ultrasound Diagnosis of Cervical Artery Dissection. In: Handbook on Neurovascular Ultrasound. KARGER; 2006: 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000092386
8. Ben Hassen W., Machet A., Edjlali-Goujon M. et al. Imaging of cervical artery dissection. Diagn. Interv. Imaging. 2014; 95 (12): 1151–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2014.10.003
9. Petro G., Witwer G., Cacayorin E. et al. Spontaneous dissection of the cervical internal carotid artery: correlation of arteriography, CT, and pathology. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1987; 148 (2): 393–398. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.148.2.393
10. Zuber M., Meary E., Meder J.F., Mas J.L. Magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic CT scan in cervical artery dissections. Stroke. 1994; 25 (3): 576–581. dhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.25.3.576
11. Leclerc X., Godefroy O., Salhi A. et al. Helical CT for the Diagnosis of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Dissection. Stroke. 1996; 27 (3): 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.3.461
12. Rodallec M.H., Marteau V., Gerber S. et al. Craniocervical Arterial Dissection: Spectrum of Imaging Findings and Differential Diagnosis. RadioGraphics. 2008; 28 (6): 1711–1728. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.286085512
13. Benninger D.H., Georgiadis D., Gandjour J., Baumgartner R.W. Accuracy of Color Duplex Ultrasound Diagnosis of Spontaneous Carotid Dissection Causing Ischemia. Stroke. 2006; 37 (2): 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000198811.65068.16
14. Kalashnikova L.A., Dobrynina L.A., Maksimova M.Yu., Tanashyan M.M., Danilova M.S. Dissection of the internal carotid and vertebral artery: management tactics (Dissekciya vnutrennej sonnoj i pozvonochnoj arterij: taktika vedeniya pacientov). Annaly` klinicheskoj i e`ksperimental`noj nevrologii = Annals of clinical and experimental neurology. 2021; 15 (1): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.25692/ACEN.2021.1.1 (In Russian)
15. Clark M., Unnam S., Ghosh S. A review of carotid and vertebral artery dissection. Br. J. Hosp. Med. 2022; 83 (4): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2021.0421
16. Kirsch E., Kaim A., Engelter S. et al. MR angiography in internal carotid artery dissection: Improvement of diagnosis by selective demonstration of the intramural haematoma. Neuroradiology. 1998; 40 (11): 704–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340050668
17. Latchaw R.E., Albers S.L. Imaging the Cervical Vasculature. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017; 59 (6): 555–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2017.05.007
18. Shakir H.J., Davies J.M., Shallwani H. Carotid and Vertebral Dissection Imaging. Curr. Pain. Headache Rep. Published online 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-016-0593-5
19. Debette S., Compter A., Labeyrie M.A. et al. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of intracranial artery dissection. Lancet Neurol. 2015; 14 (6): 640–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00009-5
20. Brott T.G., Halperin J.L., Abbara S. et al. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/ SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Executive Summary. Vascular Medicine. 2011; 16 (1): 35–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863x11399328
21. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013; 33 (9): 629–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102413485658
22. Provenzale J.M., Sarikaya B. Comparison of Test Performance Characteristics of MRI, MR Angiography, and CT Angiography in the Diagnosis of Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissection: A Review of the Medical Literature. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009; 193 (4): 1167–1174. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.08.1688
23. Elijovich L., Kazmi K., Gauvrit J.Y., Law M. The emerging role of multidetector row CT angiography in the diagnosis of cervical arterial dissection: preliminary study. Neuroradiology. 2006; 48 (9): 606–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-006-0100-5
24. Vertinsky A.T., Schwartz N.E., Fischbein N.J. et al. Comparison of Multidetector CT Angiography and MR Imaging of Cervical Artery Dissection. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008; 29 (9): 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a1189
25. Lyrer P., Engelter S. Antithrombotic Drugs for Carotid Artery Dissection. Stroke. 2004; 35 (2): 613–614. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000112970.63735.fc
26.
27.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Orlova E.V., Berdalin A.B., Khaitsman D.M., Lelyuk V.G., Lelyuk S.E. Echographic pattern features of dissections of the extracranial parts of the brachiocephalic arteries. Medical Visualization. 2024;28(3):77-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1392