Classification of complications of breast augmentation with silicone gel implants
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1196
Abstract
Aim: Studying, statistical processing and classification of complications that arose after breast augmentation with silicone gel implants.
Material and methods. Complex clinic-radiological examination of 590 women after a breast augmentation with silicone gel implants was performed. Various complications after breast augmentation were diagnosed in 223 (37.8%) cases. Radiology examination included X-ray mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (X-ray, US and MRI).
Results. The analysis of the data obtained allowed us to divide all the identified complications of breast augmentation into 3 groups depending on the etiology and pathogenesis of their occurrence.
Conclusion. The proposed classification of complications of breast augmentation using silicone gel implants, based on their etiology and pathogenesis, will allow to choose the optimal treatment method predicting its efficiency.
About the Authors
T. A. Shumakova
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation;
I.I. Dzhanelidze Saint-Petersburg Scientific-Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Shumakova – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of Department of Radiology and Radiation Medicine; Head of MRI Department
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., St. Petersburg, 197022;
3-A, Budapeshtskaya str., St. Petersburg 192242
Phone: +7-921-994-54-40
V. E. Savello
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation;
I.I. Dzhanelidze Saint-Petersburg Scientific-Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victor E. Savello – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Radiology and Radiation Medicine; Head of Department of Radiation Diagnostics
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., St. Petersburg, 197022;
3-A, Budapeshtskaya str., St. Petersburg 192242
S. V. Serebryakova
Nikiforov Russian Center of Emergency and Radiation Medicine, of the Ministry of Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Serebryakova – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Therapy and Integrative Medicine of the Institute of Continuing Professional Education “Extreme Medicine”; Head of the MRI office of Clinic № 1
4/2, Academic Lebedev str., St. Petersburg 194044
I. S. Afanasieva
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation;
I.I. Dzhanelidze Saint-Petersburg Scientific-Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina S. Afanasieva – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Radiology of Radiology and Radiation Medicine; radiologist
6-8, L'va Tolstogo str., St. Petersburg, 197022;
3-A, Budapeshtskaya str., St. Petersburg 192242
References
1. Adamyan A.A., Ostretsova N. I., Chudinova T.M. et al. Problems of development and application of silicone materials in plastic surgery. Annals Plastic, Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery. 1997; 2: 41–51. (In Russian)
2. Cheberda E. Pros and cons applications of silicone artificial limbs of mammary glands. Russian Journal of Surgery = Annaly Khirurgii. 1997; 3: 71–72. (In Russian)
3. Dobryakova O.B., Kovyntsev N.N. Augmentation of Mammary Glands Silicone Gel Implants. Moscow: MOC CENTER, 2000. 148 p. (In Russian)
4. Grebenkova O.B. Plastika of mammary glands. Novosibirsk: OFFSET, 1994. 104 p. (In Russian)
5. Ishmametyev I.L., Starostina V. V. Grade of results of esthetic increase in mammary glands. Annals of Plastic, Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery. 1999; 32: 29–31. (In Russian)
6. Heden P. Encyclopedia of plastic surgery. M.: Nuclear heating plant. Astrel, 2001: 198–214. (In Russian)
7. Juanpere S., Perez E., Huc O. et al. Imaging of breast implants-a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2011; 2 (6): 653–670.
8. Pavlyuchenko L.L. Possible mistakes and complications at operations of esthetic increase in mammary glands. Annals of Plastic, Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery. 1998; 1: 48–52. (In Russian)
9. Patsiora I.A., Boletuses A.M. The cosmetic and reconstructive mastoplasty: Materials II of the International conference “The Modern Approaches to Development of Efficient Dressing Tools, Suture Materials and Polymeric Implants”. Moscow, 1995: 237–239. (In Russian)
10. Caffee H.H. The effect of hematoma on implants capsules. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1986; 16 (2): 102–105.
11. Daw J.L., Lewis V.L., Smith J.W. Chronic expanding hematoma within a periprosthetic breast capsule. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1996; 97 (7): 1469–1472.
12. Soo M.S., Williford M.E. Seromas in the breast: imaging findings. Crit. Rev. Diagn. Imaging. 1995; 36 (5): 385– 440.
13. Adams W.P. Jr., Conner W.C., Barton F.E. Jr., Rohrich R.J. Optimizing breast pocket irrigation: an in vitro study and clinical implications. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2000; 105 (1): 334–338.
14. Biggs T.M., Cukier J, Worthing LF. Augmentation mammaplasty: a review of 18 years. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1981; 69 (3): 445–450.
15. Ayvazyan T.V., Kulnacheva V. E., Shekhter A.B. Fibrous kapsulyarny contracture at implantation of an endoprosthesis of a mammary gland. Annals of Plastic, Reconstructive and Esthetic Surgery. 1998; 1: 53–61. (In Russian)
16. Spear S.L., Baker J.L. Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1995; 96 (5): 1119–1125.
17. Steiert A.E., Boyce M., Sorg H. Capsular contracture by silicone breast implants: possible causes, biocompatibility, and prophylactic strategies. Med. Devices. (Auckl). 2013; 6: 211–218.
18. Chung K.C., Greenfield V.H., Walter M.S. Decision-analysis methology in the work-up of women with suspected silicone breast implant rupture. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1998; 102 (3): 689–695.
19. Cher D.J., Conwell J.A., Mandel J.S. MRI for detecting silicone breast implant rupture: meta-analysis and implications. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2001; 47 (4): 367–380.
20. Hölmich L.R., Vejborg I.M., Conrad C. et al. Untreated silicone breast implant rupture. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2004; 114 (1): 204–214.
21. Helbich T.H., Wunderbaldinger P., Plenk H. et al. The value of MRI in silicone granuloma of the breast. Eur. J. Radiol. 1997; 24: 155–158. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(96)01027-3
22. Abramo A.C., Casas S.G., Dotta A.A. et al. Late spontaneous extrusion of a texturized silicine gel mammary implant. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 1999; 23 (6): 433–436.
23. Lista F., Tutino R., Khan A., Ahmad J. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2013; 132 (2): 295–303.
24. Hester T.R., Ghazi BH, Moyer H.R. et al. Use of dermal matrix to prevent capsular contracture in aesthetic breast surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012; 130 (5, Suppl. 2): 126S–136S.
25. Maxwell G.P, Brown M.H, Oefelein M.G. et al. Clinical considerations regarding the risks and benefits of textured surface implants and double capsule. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011; 128 (2): 593–595.
26. Belousov A.E. Plastic, reconstructive and esthetic surgery. SPb.: Hippocrates, 1998. 744 p. (In Russian)
27. Beraka G.J. Rupture of implants following mammogfaphy (correspondence). Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1995; 95 (5): 936–937.
28. Hall-Findlay E.J. Breast implant complication review: double capsules and late seromas. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011; 127(1): 56–66.
29. Mayborodin I.V., Kovyntsev N.N., Dobryakova O.B. Microcirculation violations as the reason of a kapsular contracture after augmentation mammaplasty. Surgery. 2007; 3: 49–53. (In Russian)
30. Roux H., Imbert I., Roudier J. et al. Autoimmune pathology and esthetic surgery. Apropos of a case. Rev. Med. Interne. 1987; 8 (5): 475–480.
31. Tabatowski K., Elson C.E., Johnston W.W. Silicone lymphadenopathy in a patient with a mammary prosthesis. Fine needle aspiration cytology, histology and analytical electron microscopy. Acta Cytol. 1990; 34 (1): 10–14.
32. Plekhanov A.V. Ultrasonic dynamic monitoring in an assessment of results of an endomammoprotezirovaniye poliakrilamidny gel and implants with a polyurethane foam covering: Dis. … Cand. Med. Sci. Nizhny Novgorod, 2000. 246 p. (In Russian)
33. Kovyntsev N. N. Augmentation of Mammary Glands Silicone Implants. Dis. ... edging. medical sciences. Omsk, 1999. 200 p. (In Russian)
34. Goodman C.M., Cohen V., Thornby J., Netscher D. The life span of silicone gel breast implants and a comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and Magnetic Resonance imaging in detecting implant rupture: a metaanalysis. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1998; 41 (6): 577–585.
35. Azavedo E., Bone B. Imaging breast with silicone implants. Eur. Radiol. 1999; 9 (2): 349–355.
36. Di Benedetto G., Cecchini S., Grassetti L. et al. Comparative study of breast implant rupture using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with surgical findings. Breast J. 2008; 14 (6): 532–537.
37. Brown F.E., Sargent S.K. Mammography changes after mammaplasty. Reduction mammaplasty. Ed. Goldwin R.M. 1990: 35–44.
38. Abduraimov A.B. Complex radiodiagnosis of postoperative and post-therapeutic changes of a mammary gland: Dis. … Doct. Med. Sci. M., 2010. 181 p. (In Russian)
39. Fisenko E.P. Instrumental diagnostics of complications of planimetric plasticity of a body by gel implants: Dis. … Doct. Med. Sci. M., 2009. 176 p. (In Russian)
40. Aktouf A., Auquit-Auckbur I., Coquerel-Beghin D. et al. Breast augmentation by Poly Implant Prothèses silicone implants: retrospective study about 99 patients. Rupture analysis and management. Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthet. 2012; 57 (6): 558–566.
41. Maijers M.C., Niessen F.B., Veldhuizen J.F. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging screening results compared with explantation results in poly implant prothèse silicone breast implants, recalled from the European market in 2010. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2014; 133 (2): 114–120.
42. Middleton M.S., McNamara M.P. Breast Implant Classification with MR Imaging Correlation. RadioGraphics. 2000; 20 (3): 1–72.
43. Berg W.A., Caskey C.I., Hamper U.Met al. Diagnosing breast implant rupture with MR imaging, US, and mammography. RadioGraphics. 1993; 13 (6): 1323–1336.
44. Hammond D.C., Khuthaila D.K. Augmentation mammaplasty In: Plastic Surgery Secrets Plus. Ed. J. Weinzweig. Elsevier, 2010: 441–445. ISBN: 978-0-323-03470-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-03470-8.X0001-4
Review
For citations:
Shumakova T.A., Savello V.E., Serebryakova S.V., Afanasieva I.S. Classification of complications of breast augmentation with silicone gel implants. Medical Visualization. 2023;27(1):69-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1196
Views:
644
Email this article 