Assessment of the influence of the liver shape on the accuracy of volume measurement and diagnosis of hepatomegaly using computed tomography
https://doi.org/10.24835/10.24835/1607-0763-1114
Abstract
The aim of the study is to determine the influence of liver shapes on the accuracy of estimating the organ volume and assessment of hepatomegaly on CT. To develop approaches to improve the accuracy of calculations for various forms of liver.
Material and methods. The work is based on the analysis of the results of 603 abdominal CT examinations available in the radiological information systems of the city of Moscow. Six dimensions of the liver were measured: transverse, vertical and anteroposterior dimensions of the right and left lobes. Using automatic segmentation, performed in special software systems IntelliSpase Portal (Philips) and Synapse 3D (Fuji), the maximum close to the true liver volume was calculated. This made it possible to carry out a mathematical analysis to obtain various formulas for calculating the liver volume, depending on its shape. A comparative assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of the developed formulas and the standard one, which does not take into account the shape of the liver, was carried out in relation to the diagnosis of hepatomegaly.
Results. During the study, the four most common types of liver forms were identified, for each of which, based on mathematical approaches, formulas for calculating the organ volume were developed. Comparative analysis of these formulas and the previously developed by us standard one showed that the root-mean-square error decreases using the formula for a certain type of liver shape. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of hepatomegaly in the differential approach do not change compared with the standard formula.
Conclusion. The existing difference in the forms of the patients’ liver does not significantly affect the approaches to determine the organ volume and establishing the fact of hepatomegaly during CT. Therefore, the standard formula for determining liver can be used in clinical practice: V = (HRL+TRL)3/21, (V – volume, HRL – high of right lobe, TRL – thickness of right lobe).
About the Authors
E. L. AlliuaRussian Federation
Emel L. Alliua – Applicant at the Department of Radiology; radiologist of Radiology Department of Clinical hospital №2 of “Medsi group” Joint Stock Company
5-3, Botkinsky proezd, Moscow 12528
Phone: 8-926-566-75-26
20/1, Delegatskaya str., Moscow 127473
A. I. Gromov
Russian Federation
Alexander I. Gromov – Doct. Of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of Department of Radiology; Head of Radiology Department of Clinical hospital №2 of “Medsi group” Joint Stock Company
20/1, Delegatskaya str., Moscow 127473
N. S. Kulberg
Russian Federation
Nikolay S. Kulberg – Cand. of Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Senior scientist
44-2, Vavilova str., Moscow 119333
References
1. Izranov V.A., Kazantseva N.V., Beletskaya M.A. Measurement of the liver volume using visualization methods of various modalities. Vestnik of I. Kant Baltic Federal University. Ser.: Natural and Medical Sciences. 2017; 2: 52–64. (In Russian)
2. Karmazanovskiy G.G. Radiation diagnostics and therapy in gastroenterology: National leadership. Moscow: GEOTARMedia; 2014. 920 p. (In Russian)
3. Samtsov E.N., Merzlikin N.V., Bausova T.V. Сomputed tomographic diagnostics of disorders of the liver. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB surgery. 2006; 11 (1): 24–27. (In Russian)
4. Alonso-Torres A., Fernandez Cuadrado J., Pinilla I. et al. Multidetector CT in the evaluation of potential living donors for liver transplantation. Radiographics. 2005; 25 (4): 1017–1030. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.254045032
5. Geraghty E.M., Boone J.M., McGahan J.P., Jain K. Normal organ volume assessment from abdominal CT. Abdom. Imaging. 2004; 29 (4): 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0139-2
6. Xiaoqi Lv, Yu Miao, Xiaoying Ren, Jianshuai Wu. The study and implementation of liver volume measuring method based on 3-dimensional reconstruction technology. Optik. 2015; 126 (17): 1534–1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.04.022
7. Hashimoto T., Sugawara Y., Tamura S. et al. Estimation of standard liver volume in Japanese living liver donors. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006; 21: 1710–1713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04433.x
8. Chaplygina E.V., Kaplunova O.A., Gubar A.S., Sukhanova O.P., Blinov I.M. Anatomical variability of the position of the liver in the abdominal cavity. Medical News of North Caucasus. 2019; 14 (2): 370–374. (In Russian)
9. Chaplygina E.V., Gubar A.S., Ramadan K.V., Sokolova Y.N. The variability of the linear parameters of liver, depending from a position of the authority in the abdominal cavity. Fundamental research. 2014; 7 (2): 382–385. (In Russian)
10. Keres L., Kingisepp G., Kyrgyz K., Lenzner A. Questions of morphology and physiology. Scientific notes of the Tartu State University. 1974: 17–18. (In Russian)
11. Bisenkov N.P., Dyskin E.A., Zabrodskaya V.F. Surgical anatomy of the abdomen. Ed. chl.-cor. AMN of the USSR prof. A.N. Maksimenkova. M.: Medicina (Leningrad), 1972. 688 p. (In Russian)
12. Petrenko V.M. The size, shape and topography of the liver before human birth. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2016; 2: 397. (In Russian)
13. Gromov A.I., Alliua E.L., Kulberg N.S. Approaches to Determining the Liver Volume and the Fact of Hepatomegalia. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2019; 100 (6): 347–354. (In Russian)
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Alliua E.L., Gromov A.I., Kulberg N.S. Assessment of the influence of the liver shape on the accuracy of volume measurement and diagnosis of hepatomegaly using computed tomography. Medical Visualization. 2022;26(1):130-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/10.24835/1607-0763-1114