Preview

Medical Visualization

Advanced search

X-ray study as an alternative method for visualizing changes in lungs, with infection caused by COVID-19

https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1024

Abstract

Introduction. Despite the existence of generally accepted diagnostic protocols, when a new coronavirus infection is suspected, in some cases, it is increasingly difficult to detect changes in the lung tissue in a timely manner due to the heavy workload of the main method of radiation diagnostics – computed tomography.

 Purpose of the study. To determine the effectiveness of the appointment of an X-ray examination as first-line metgod, as well as to carry out a comparative analysis of the use of radiation diagnostics methods – computed tomography and radiography in relation to the diagnostic sensitivity to changes in lung tissue when a person is infected with the SARS-COV-2 virus.

Materials and methods. 150 patients (63.0 ± 8.4 years) with confirmed coronavirus infection were examined. Each of the participants underwent X-ray examination and computed tomography of the chest organs. The percentage of subjects studied for each of the degrees of severity of lung damage was determined to identify the proportion of involvement of lung tissue in the pathological process in the bulk of the examined individuals.

Results. Of the 150 patients, changes in the lung tissue during chest X-ray were detected in 97 (65%), respectively, in 53 (35%), pathological changes in the lungs were not visualized. When examining patients by computed tomography, changes in the lungs were detected in 143 patients (95%), X-ray morphological changes were not detected in 7 subjects (5%). When detecting the volume of lung damage, it turned out that the majority of the subjects – 86 people (57%) – had the degree of damage CT-2. The degree of CT-1 and CT-3 was determined in 26 (17%) and 25 (17%) patients, respectively. CT-4 was observed in 6 patients (4%), and in 5% of cases, CT was not able to detect pathological changes in the lung tissue, the degree of CT-0 was established.

Conclusion. In the assessment of viral lung damage, radiography takes a significant place, but in 35% of cases, radiographic examination failed to identify the existing pathological changes. CT of the chest organs confirms its value as the “gold standard” in the study of pulmonary pathology in coronavirus infection, but if it is impossible to perform it, radiography is recommended.

About the Authors

E. A. Litvinenko
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2 of the Ministry of Health of the Krasnodar Region
Russian Federation

Elena A. Litvinenko, Head of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics

6/2, Red Partizan str., Krasnodar, 350012


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study had no sponsorship.



M. M. Erovenko
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2 of the Ministry of Health of the Krasnodar Region
Russian Federation

Maria M. Erovenko, radiologist

6/2, Red Partizan str., Krasnodar, 350012


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study had no sponsorship.



I. V. Burova
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2 of the Ministry of Health of the Krasnodar Region
Russian Federation

Ilona V. Burova, ward nurse, 5th year student of Kuban State Medical University

6/2, Red Partizan str., Krasnodar, 350012


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The study had no sponsorship.



References

1. Yudin A.L., Abovich Yu.A., Yumatova E.A., Bronov O.Yu. COVID-19. Diagnosis and treatment of lung damage. Medical Visualization. 2020; 24 (2): 37–49. https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2020-2-37-49 (In Russian)

2. Harahwa T.A., Lai Yau T.H., Lim-Cooke M.S., Al-Haddi S., Zeinah M., Harky A. The optimal diagnostic methods for COVID-19. Diagnosis (Berl.). 2020; 7 (4): 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0058

3. Morozov S.P., Chernina V.Yu., Blokhin A.I., Gombolevskiy V.A. Chest computed tomography for outcome prediction in laboratory-confirmed COVID-19: a retrospective analysis of 38,051 cases. Digital Diagnostics. 2020; 1 (1): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.17816/DD46791 (In Russian)

4. Aljondi R., Alghamdi S. Diagnostic Value of Imaging Modalities for COVID-19: Scoping Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020; 22 (8): e19673. https://doi.org/10.2196/19673

5. Bai H.X., Hsieh B., Xiong Z., Halsey K., Choi J.W., Tran T.M.L., Pan I., Shi L.B., Wang D.C., Mei J., Jiang X.L., Zeng Q.H., Egglin T.K., Hu P.F., Agarwal S., Xie F.F., Li S., Healey T., Atalay M.K., Liao W.H. Performance of Radiologists in Differentiating COVID-19 from Non-COVID-19 Viral Pneumonia at Chest CT. Radiology. 2020; 296(2): E46-E54. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200823

6. Zamyatina K.A., Mikhailyuk K.A., Kurochkina A.I., Demidova V.S., Kаrmаzаnovsky G.G. COVID-19: comparison lung CT signs and biochemical parameters in the groups of patients with three-time positive RT-PCR and with triple negative RT-PCR test during the period of hospitalization. Medical Visualization. 2021; 25 (1): 14–26. https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-996 (In Russian)

7. Wong H., Lam H., Fong A., Leung S., Chin T., Lo C., Lui M., Lee J., Chiu K., Chung T., Lee E., Wan E., Hung I., Lam T., Kuo M., Ng M. Frequency and Distribution of Chest Radiographic Findings in Patients Positive for COVID-19. Radiology. 2020; 296 (2): E72–E78. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201160

8. Ai T., Yang Z., Hou H., Zhan C., Chen C., Lv W., Tao Q., Sun Z., Xia L. Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases. Radiology. 2020; 296 (2): E32–E40. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200642

9. Islam N., Ebrahimzadeh S., Salameh J.P., Kazi S., Fabiano N., Treanor L., Absi M., Hallgrimson Z., Leeflang M.M., Hooft L., van der Pol C.B., Prager R., Hare S.S., Dennie C., Spijker R., Deeks J.J., Dinnes J., Jenniskens K., Korevaar D.A., Cohen J.F., Van den Bruel A., Takwoingi Y., van de Wijgert J., Damen J.A, Wang J., McInnes M.D. Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 3: CD013639. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub4

10. Murphy K., Smits H., Knoops A., Korst M., Samson T., Scholten E., Schalekamp S., Schaefer-Prokop C., Philipsen R., Meijers A., Melendez J., van Ginneken B., Rutten M.. COVID-19 on Chest Radiographs: A Multireader Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence System. Radiology. 2020; 296 (3): E166–E172. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201874

11. Jacobi A., Chung M., Bernheim A., Eber C. Portable chest X-ray in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): A pictorial review. Clin. Imaging. 2020; 64: 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.001

12. Abbasi W.A., Abbas S.A., Andleeb S., Ul Islam G., Ajaz S.A., Arshad K., Khalil S., Anjam A., Ilyas K., Saleem M., Chughtai J., Abbas A. COVIDC: An expert system to diagnose COVID-19 and predict its severity using chest CT scans: Application in radiology. Inform. Med. Unlocked. 2021; 23: 100540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100540

13. Borghesi A., Maroldi R. COVID-19 outbreak in Italy: experimental chest X-ray scoring system for quantifying and monitoring disease progression. Radiol. Med. 2020; 125 (5): 509–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01200-3

14. Carotti M, Salaffi F, Sarzi-Puttini P, Agostini A, Borgheresi A, Minorati D, Galli M, Marotto D, Giovagnoni A. Chest CT features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: key points for radiologists. Radiol. Med. 2020; 125: 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01237-4


Review

For citations:


Litvinenko E.A., Erovenko M.M., Burova I.V. X-ray study as an alternative method for visualizing changes in lungs, with infection caused by COVID-19. Medical Visualization. 2021;25(2):12-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-1024

Views: 1207


ISSN 1607-0763 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9516 (Online)