Multispiral computed tomography in the detection and differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2019-1-28-37
Abstract
Purpose. To determine the possibility of MSCT in the differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Materials and methods. MSCT was performed on a multidetector 64-slice computer tomograph Aquilion company Toshiba with multi-phase contrast enhancement. The results of MSCT 108 (100%) patients hospitalized for emergency indications with suspected acute appendicitis in the surgical Department of the “City clinical hospital them M.E. Zhadkevich Of the Department of health of the city of Moscow” were analyzed from July 2017 to July 2018.
Results. The age range of the subjects ranged from 18 to 81 years, including 53 women (49%), 55 men (51%).
CT-picture of acute appendicitis was observed in 23 (21%) patients. In 85 (79%) cases, according to MSCT, no direct signs of inflammatory changes in the Appendix were determined. In this case, acute appendicitis was confirmed during surgery in 22 (20%) cases. A false positive result was obtained in one patient. In a comprehensive examination were diagnosed: acute mesenteric thrombosis -1(1%) case, acute mesadenitis - 1 (1%) case, acute pyelonephritis - 2 (2%) case, concretion of the right ureter -2 (2%) case, hemorrhage in the cyst of the right ovary -1 (1%) case, diverticulitis - 6 (5%) cases, tumors of the blind and ascending intestines - 2 (2%) case. In 68 (63%) cases, patients were discharged without surgery after intestinal colic relief. 2 (2%) patients were operated on with negative MSCT results, as the acute abdominal clinic was preserved. Acute phlegmonous appendicitis was diagnosed intraoperatively. The sensitivity of MSCT in the detection of acute appendicitis in our observations was 91.7%, specificity -98.8%, the prognostic value of the positive result-95.7%, the prognostic value of the negative result - 95.4%.
Conclusion. Multispiral computed tomography is highly informative in the differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis, its use avoids unreasonable surgical interventions.
About the Authors
M. V. RostovtsevRussian Federation
Mikhail V. Rostovtsev - dotf. of med. sci., Head of the x-ray.
Moscow
Competing Interests: no conflict of interest
N. V. Nudnov
Russian Federation
Nikolay V. Nudnov - dotf. of med. sci., Professor.
117997 Moscow, Profsoyuznaya str., 86, Phone: +7-985-224-04-68
Competing Interests: no conflict of interest
I. V. Litvinenko
Russian Federation
Iya V. Litvinenko - cand. of med. sci., radiologist.
Moscow
Competing Interests: no conflict of interest
E. V. Pronkina
Russian Federation
Еlena V. Pronkina – radiologist.
MoscowCompeting Interests: no conflict of interest
O. Yu. Vershinina
Russian Federation
Olga Yu. Vershinina - a clinical resident.
Moscow
Competing Interests: no conflict of interest
V. V. Nezhlukchenko
Russian Federation
Valeriya V. Nezhlukchenko - a clinical resident.
Moscow
Competing Interests: no conflict of interest
References
1. Soroca А.К. Laparoscopy in clinical and morphological parallels of appendectomies. Endoskopicheskaya khirur-giya. 2013; 1: 12-15. (In Russian)
2. Barclay L. Multidetector CT Recommended before appendectomy. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011; 154: 789-796.
3. Laurell H., Hansson L.-E., Gunnarsson U. Manifestations of acute appendicitis: a prospective study on acute abdominal pain. Dig. Surg. 2013; 30: 198-206. http://doi.org/10.1159/000350043.
4. Raja A.S., Wright C., Sodickson A.D., Zane R.D., Schiff G.D., Hanson R., Baeyens P.F., Khorasani R. Negative appendectomy rate in the era: an 18-year perspective. Radiology. 2010; 256: 460-465. http://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091570.
5. Rogers W., Hoffman J., Noori N. Harms of CT Scanning prior to surgery for suspected appendicitis. Evid. Based. Med. 2015; 20 (1): 3-4. http://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2014-110075.
6. Greenberg A.A., Mikhaylusov S.V., Tronin R.Yu., Drozdov G.E. Diagnostics of difficult cases of acute appendicitis. M.: Triad-X, 1998. 128 p. (In Russian)
7. Karmazanovsky G.G., Ternovoy S.K. National leadership. Radiation diagnosis and therapy in gastroenterology. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2014. 706 p. (In Russian)
8. Kuzin M.I. Surgical diseases. 4th ed. Rev. and extra. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2018. 992 p. (In Russian)
9. Charyshkin L., Yakovlev S. Problems of diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Ulyanovsk medico-biological journal. 2015; 1: 92-100. (In Russian)
10. Sovtsov S.A., Rrevel-Muroz Zh.A., Shkarednykh V.Yu. Diagnostic trends in acute appendicitis. Vestnik khirurgii im. I.I. Grekova. 2016; 175 (3): 79-82. http://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2016-175-3-79-82. (In Russian)
11. Kholmatov P.M., Nagiev B.A., J.D. Muhamadiev. Features of diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women. Emergency Medical Care. 2004; 3: 58-59. (In Russian)
12. Kolganova I.P., Karmazanovsky G.G. Computed tomography and x-ray diagnostics of abdominal diseases: Clinical and x-ray problems and answers for self-control. Issue 1. M.: Vidar-M, 2014. 208 p. (In Russian)
13. Kaminsky M.N. Modern possibilities in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Far East Medical Journal. 2014; 4: 122-127. (In Russian)
14. Marincic Boret, Dondelinger Robert F. Emergency radiology in 2 parts: Translation Vertjachih N.G., Sinitsyn V.E. ed. by Sinitsyn V. E. M.: Vidar-M, 2009. 401 p. (In Russian)
15. Al-Khayal K.A., Al-Omran M.A. Computed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of equivocal acute appendicitis. A meta-analysis. Saudi Med. J. 2007; 28 (2): 173-180.
16. Toorenvliet B.R., Wiersma F, Bakker R.F, Merkus J.W., Breslau P.J., Hamming J.F Routine ultrasound and limited computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Wld J. Surg. 2010; 34: 2278-2285. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0694-y.
17. Antevil J.L., Rivera L., Landerberg B.J., Hahm G., Favata M.A., Brown C.V.R. Computer tomography to a basis clinical diagnostic ways concerning an acute appendicitis: perspective checks. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2006; 203 (6): 849-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.012.
18. Pen In Chve. Radiologic diagnosis of diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Translation Sidorova Y.B., Vishnyakov V.M. M.: Publishing house Panfilov, 2018. 496 p. (In Russian)
19. Poletti P.A., Platon A., De Perrot T., Sarasin F, Andereg-gen E., Rutschmann O., Dupuis-Lozeron E., Perneger T., Gervaz P., Becker C.D. Acute appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm integrating ultrasound and low-dose CT to reduce the need of standard CT. Eur. Radiol. 2011; 21 (12): 2558-2566. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2212-5.
20. Randen A., Lameris W., Es H.W., Heesewijk H.P, Ramshorst B., Ten Hove W., Bouma W.H., Leeuwen M.S., Keulen E.M., Bossuyt P.M., Stoker J., Boermeester M.A. A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. OPTIMA Study Group. Eur. Radiol. 2011; 21 (7): 1535-1545. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2087-5.
21. Rotkov I.L. Diagnostic and tactical errors in acute appendicitis. M.: Medicine, 1988. 208 p. (In Russian)
22. Sokolov M.E. Huseynov A.Z. Huseynov T.A. Shlyakhova M.A. Modern diagnostics of acute appendicitis. Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2017; 24 (4): 219-230. http://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a38fefa3cae47.27739262. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Rostovtsev M.V., Nudnov N.V., Litvinenko I.V., Pronkina E.V., Vershinina O.Yu., Nezhlukchenko V.V. Multispiral computed tomography in the detection and differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Medical Visualization. 2019;(1):28-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0763-2019-1-28-37