Приложениk= 7;

Supplement 2. Assessment of the risk of bias by QUADAS-2 in different meta-analys= es, the relative number of articles (%) to the total number of articles in the meta-analysis is given

QUADAS-2	Risk of bias	Applicability Concerns	Authors' overall assessment of risk of bias
Patient selection	Index test	Reference Standart	Flow and Timing	Patient selection	Index Test	Reference standard
Meta-analysis	low (%)	unclear (%)	hight (%)	low (%)	unclear (%)	hight (%)	low (%)	unclear (%)	hight (%)	low (%)	unclear (%)	hight (%)	low (%)	unclear (%)	hight (%)	low (%)	unclear (%)	hight (%)	low (%)	unclear (%)	hight (%)
J.H. Yoon et= al., 2023 [9]	56		44	100			100			100			81		19	100			81		19	L= ow=
S.E. Hickman et al., 2023 [10]	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	100			100									100							H= igh
L.T. Thong e= t al., 2023 [18]			100						65			96									46	H= igh=
X. Zheng et = al., 2022 [21]	74		26	90		10	85	5	10													L= ow=
M. Liu et al= ., 2023 [55]					25	40		40			30											L= ow=
X. Zhang et = al., 2022 [16]			28	100			87	13		100			95			100			100			L= ow=
P. Potipimpa= non et al., 2022 [32]			40			8	100									100			100			L= ow=
C.A. Campello et al, 2023 [30]	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	&nbs= p;	H= igh=
F. Nabizadeh= et al., 2023 [46]			27					7				10										L= ow=
M. Din et al= ., 2023 [25]			65			74									95							H= igh=
M.D. Jшrgensen et al., 2023 [56]	57	43	0	71	29	0	57	29	14	71	15	14	57	43	0	57	43	0	71	15	14	L= ow=
H.Y. Kim et = al., 2021 [43]		71		100			100				86		100			100			100			L= ow=
A. Adamou et= al., 2023 [45]																						L= ow=
S. Agarwal e= t al., 2023 [22]	17	22	61	61	22	17	56	0	44	78	0	22	56	11	33	22	28	50	72	6	22	H= igh=
S. Bedrikovetski et al., 2021a [23]	88	0	12	94	0	6	88	6	6	0	100	0	100	0	0	100	0	0	94	6	0	L= ow=
S. Soffer et= al., 2023 [36]	43	0	57	100	0	0	57	0	0	71	0	0										H= igh=
L. Gao et al= ., 2021 [14]	57	29	14	100	0	0	86	14	0	86	14	0	100	0	0	100	0	0	86	14	0	L= ow=
Q. Wang et a= l., 2022 [29]	72	28	0	91	9	0	97	3	0	81	19	0	91	9	0	97	3	0	100	0	0	L= ow=
T.N. Poly et= al., 2021 [15]	0	0	100	0	100	0	0	0	100	0	100	0	100	0	0	0	100	0	0	100	0	H= igh=
T.E. Komolafe et al., 2023 [28]	90	5	5	85	15	0	95	5	0	55	45	0	100	0	0	75	20	5	100	0	0	M= edium
B.G. Taib et al., 2023 [39]	13	87	0	0	62	38	25	75	0	100	0	0	100	0	0	100	0	0	75	25	0	H= igh=
S. Sadr. et = al., 2023 [27]	78	22	0	61	17	22	50	17	33	78	11	11	88	6	6	72	6	22	50	6	44	L= ow=
K. Evangelis= ta et al., 2022 [57]	0	100	0	33	33	33	67	33				0	100	0		67	0	33	67	33	0	M= edium=
Y. Xue et al= ., 2022 [12]																						M= edium=
H.L. Xu= et al., 2022 [26]	32	12	54	3	9	88	85	15	0	88	9	3	32	65	3	3	12	85	85	15	0	H= igh=
E.A. Dumitre= scu et al., 2022 [31]	80	20	0	60	50	10	90	10	0	70	10	20	100	0	0	100	0	0	100	0	0	L= ow=
S. Bedrikovetski et al., 2021b [24]	29	0	71	43	0	57	95	0	5	0	100	0	100	0	0	86	0	14	100	0	0	H= igh=
Y. Xu et al.= , 2021 [38]	76	8	16	52	32	16	84	16	0	92	8	0	36	40	24	76	24	0	60	32	8	M= edium=